These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12681871)
1. Ruptured membranes at term: randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction. Lo JY; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):685-9. PubMed ID: 12681871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL. Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical priming with oral misoprostol in pre-labor rupture of membranes at term. Ngai SW; To WK; Lao T; Ho PC Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 87(6):923-6. PubMed ID: 8649699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes. Ngai SW; Chan YM; Lam SW; Lao TT BJOG; 2000 Feb; 107(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 10688506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations. Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction. Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol vs. oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Nigam A; Singh VK; Dubay P; Pandey K; Bhagoliwal A; Prakash A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Sep; 86(3):398-400. PubMed ID: 15325864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Abramovici D; Goldwasser S; Mabie BC; Mercer BM; Goldwasser R; Sibai BM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1108-12. PubMed ID: 10561627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active management of term prelabour rupture of membranes with oral misoprostol. Shetty A; Stewart K; Stewart G; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A BJOG; 2002 Dec; 109(12):1354-8. PubMed ID: 12504970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial. Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sublingual Misoprostol versus Oxytocin to Induce Labor in Term Premature Rupture of Membranes in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial. Unthanan S; Petcharat K; Prommas S; Smanchat B; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():9449036. PubMed ID: 35198639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term. Crane JM; Delaney T; Hutchens D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 189(3):720-4. PubMed ID: 14526301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial. Cheung PC; Yeo EL; Wong KS; Tang LC Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16929421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Al-Hussaini TK; Abdel-Aal SA; Youssef MA Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jul; 82(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 12834947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]