192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12683395)
1. Thinking further about value: commentary on "A taxonomy of value in clinical research".
Grady C
IRB; 2002; 24(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 12683395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A taxonomy of value in clinical research.
Casarett DJ; Karlawish JH; Moreno JD
IRB; 2002; 24(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12683394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing benefits in clinical research: why diversity in benefit assessment can be risky.
Churchill LR; Nelson DK; Henderson GE; King NM; Davis AM; Leahey E; Wilfond BS
IRB; 2003; 25(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 14569987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Introduction to special issue of Accountability in Research on the review and approval of biomedical research proposals: a call for a centralized national human research protections system.
Mann H; Shamoo AE
Account Res; 2006; 13(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
Dhai A
Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
Nelson CH; McPherson DH
NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Handbook of medical ethics: ethics in biomedical research.
Issues Med Ethics; 1996; 4(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 15011683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based practice of research ethics review?
Beagan B; McDonald M
Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 16459416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimal risk and its implications. Proceedings of the NCEHR National Workshop on Minimal Risk, March 31-April 1, 2000 held in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anderson JA; Weijer C
NCEHR Commun; 2001 Sep; 11(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 15540386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research ethics committees--the future.
Harris J
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):123-38. PubMed ID: 15282930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When "minimal risk" research yields clinically-significant data, maybe the risks aren't so minimal.
Sharp HM; Orr RD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(2):W32-6. PubMed ID: 15186687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research on humans: what have we learned?
King NM
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 12962102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Maintaining community trust in biomedical research involving humans.
Breen KJ
Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):793-8. PubMed ID: 16617533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. IRBs: going too far or not far enough?
Felten DL
Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1388-9; author reply 1388-9. PubMed ID: 16959990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.
Fernandez CV; Kodish E; Weijer C
IRB; 2003; 25(3):12-9. PubMed ID: 14569989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
Wegman DH; Major E
Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 19016264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
