These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12683395)

  • 21. Rules of the game: institutional review boards.
    Lubowitz JH; Poehling GG; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 18375265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
    Himmelsbach CK
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-220. PubMed ID: 12085911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monitoring of approved research by a Scottish LREC: two questionnaires.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Dec; (153):19-21. PubMed ID: 15584154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: a review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies.
    Lingler JH; Parker LS; DeKosky ST; Schulz R
    IRB; 2006; 28(3):11-8. PubMed ID: 17036439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.
    Atici E; Erdemir AD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Protecting human subjects: do IRBs do the job?
    King PA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Jun; 9(3):4, 44-5. PubMed ID: 478840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Just-in-time IRB review: capitalizing on scientific merit review to improve human subjects research compliance.
    Kelly PA; Johnson ML
    IRB; 2005; 27(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 15948325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rethinking protections for human subjects.
    Gunsalus CK
    Chron High Educ; 2002 Nov; 49(12):B34. PubMed ID: 15287114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When a research subject calls with a complaint, what will the institutional review board do?
    Motil KJ; Allen J; Taylor A
    IRB; 2004; 26(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 15281212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.
    Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences
    Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; (182):17-23. PubMed ID: 14983848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.
    Cook-Deegan RM
    Cerebrum; 2000; 2(2):73-91. PubMed ID: 15986545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
    Ross LF
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethics of human research.
    Forde KA
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Mar; 22(3):577-9. PubMed ID: 18288526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The current situation regarding the establishment of national ethical guidelines for biomedical research in Thailand and its neighboring countries.
    Kojima S; Waikagul J; Rojekittikhun W; Keicho N
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2005 May; 36(3):728-32. PubMed ID: 16124447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In defense of a single standard of research risk for all children.
    Nelson RM; Ross LF
    J Pediatr; 2005 Nov; 147(5):565-6. PubMed ID: 16291339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
    Noah BA
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research oversight through new lenses: the consortium to examine clinical research ethics.
    Sugarman J; Eckenwiler LA; Emanuel EJ
    IRB; 2003; 25(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 12833899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.