348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12684232)
1. Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle(3) radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons.
Bedford JL; Childs PJ; Nordmark Hansen V; Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Verhaegen F; Warrington AP
Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):163-76. PubMed ID: 12684232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system.
Crop F; Reynaert N; Pittomvils G; Paelinck L; De Gersem W; De Wagter C; Vakaet L; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3275-90. PubMed ID: 17505102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of an in-line kilovoltage imaging system and implementation in treatment planning.
Dzierma Y; Nuesken F; Otto W; Alaei P; Licht N; Rübe C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(4):913-9. PubMed ID: 24456996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system.
Paudel MR; Kim A; Sarfehnia A; Ahmad SB; Beachey DJ; Sahgal A; Keller BM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):230-241. PubMed ID: 27929496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Pinnacle³ photon convolution-superposition algorithm applied to fast neutron beams.
Kalet AM; Sandison GA; Phillips MH; Parvathaneni U
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4305. PubMed ID: 24257274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation.
Sikora M; Dohm O; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4449-63. PubMed ID: 17634643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theoretical and experimental validation of treatment planning for narrow MLC defined photon fields.
Lydon JM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2701-14. PubMed ID: 15901964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of accurate linear accelerator head modelling for IMRT Monte Carlo calculations.
Reynaert N; Coghe M; De Smedt B; Paelinck L; Vanderstraeten B; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):831-46. PubMed ID: 15798258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo photon beam modeling and commissioning for radiotherapy dose calculation algorithm.
Toutaoui A; Ait chikh S; Khelassi-Toutaoui N; Hattali B
Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):833-7. PubMed ID: 24947967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric verification of lung phantom calculated by collapsed cone convolution: A Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation.
Najafzadeh M; Nickfarjam A; Jabbari K; Markel D; Chow JCL; Takabi FS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 30614811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards an objective evaluation of tolerances for beam modeling in a treatment planning system.
Rangel A; Ploquin N; Kay I; Dunscombe P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):6011-25. PubMed ID: 17881816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM.
Francescon P; Cavedon C; Reccanello S; Cora S
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1579-87. PubMed ID: 10947261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
