150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1268450)
1. Some evidence for 'speech' as an acoustic feature.
Morton J; Chambers SM
Br J Psychol; 1976 Feb; 67(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 1268450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory recency in immediate memory.
Surprenant AM; Pitt MA; Crowder RG
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1993 May; 46(2):193-223. PubMed ID: 8316636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).
Baddeley AD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 11082863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
Beaman CP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
Hanley JR; Shah N
Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Acoustic memory of the speech evoked by a 22-channel cochlear implant].
Kumakawa K
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1991 Aug; 94(8):1136-41. PubMed ID: 1960594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The acoustic correlates of "speechlike": a use of the suffix effect.
Morton J; Marcus SM; Ottley P
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Dec; 110(4):568-93. PubMed ID: 6459408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.
Lowenstein JH; Cribb C; Shell P; Yuan Y; Nittrouer S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():276-294. PubMed ID: 30933869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.
Greene RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 2522515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
Greene RL
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
Neath I
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Articulatory complexity at item boundaries in serial recall: the case of Welsh and English digit span.
Murray A; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):594-8. PubMed ID: 12018511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ineluctable modality of the audible: perceptual determinants of auditory verbal short-term memory.
Maidment DW; Macken WJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):989-97. PubMed ID: 22468724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
Huang ST; Glenberg AM
Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phonological short-term store and the nature of the recency effect: evidence from neuropsychology.
Vallar G; Papagano C
Brain Cogn; 1986 Oct; 5(4):428-42. PubMed ID: 3580186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory word serial recall benefits from orthographic dissimilarity.
Pattamadilok C; Lafontaine H; Morais J; Kolinsky R
Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 3):321-41. PubMed ID: 21033650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
