These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1268474)
1. Biopsy of the impalpable breast lesion detected by mammography. Millis RR; McKinna JA; Hamlin IM; Greening WP Br J Surg; 1976 May; 63(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 1268474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prebiopsy localisation of impalpable breast lesions. Hisham AN; Harjit K; Fatimah O; Yun SI Med J Malaysia; 2004 Aug; 59(3):402-5. PubMed ID: 15727388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. Lee CH; Carter D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7998574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The biopsy of impalpable lesions of the breast. Leinster SJ; Whitehouse GH; McDicken I Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Mar; 164(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 3824116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prevalence of carcinoma in palpable vs impalpable, mammographically detected lesions. Bassett LW; Liu TH; Giuliano AE; Gold RH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jul; 157(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 1646562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Can it replace open biopsy? Layfield LJ; Parkinson B; Wong J; Giuliano AE; Bassett LW Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(9):2007-11. PubMed ID: 1913550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-view specimen radiography in surgical biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses. Rebner M; Pennes DR; Baker DE; Adler DD; Boyd P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):283-5. PubMed ID: 3496752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of fine-wire localization biopsy for impalpable breast cancer. Hastrich DJ; Dunn JM; Armstrong JS; Davies JD; Davies ZD; Webb AJ; Farndon JR Br J Surg; 1992 Oct; 79(10):1038-41. PubMed ID: 1330196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The problem of discrimination in mammography. Arguments for using a biological test object. Tonge KA; Davis R Br J Radiol; 1976 Aug; 49(584):678-85. PubMed ID: 953386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Impalpable cancers of the breast. Histological and immunohistochemical study]. Charpin C; Andrac L; Habib MC; Vacheret H; Lavaut MN; Piana L Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1994; 42(5):225-33. PubMed ID: 7872814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative estimation of the limitations of mammography and echography in senologic practice]. Murat JL; Grumbach Y; Baratte B; Leflot P Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Dec; 79(12):807-19. PubMed ID: 6397831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography in 1980: an historical perspective and present state of the art. Snyder RE Clin Bull; 1980; 10(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 7389079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specimen xeroradiography after needle localization and biopsy of noncalcified, nonpalpable breast lesions. Pitzen RH; Urdaneta LF; Al-Jurf AS; Jochimsen PR; Brown RC; Abu-Yousef MM; Platz CE Am Surg; 1985 Jan; 51(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 3966724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Needle localization of breast lesion using xeroradiography. Mazurek AW Radiol Technol; 1978; 49(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 644031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Technique and results of localization biopsy in a breast screening programme. Campbell ID; Royle GT; Coddington R; Theaker J; Rubin CM; Guyer PB; Taylor I Br J Surg; 1991 Sep; 78(9):1113-5. PubMed ID: 1933200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Excisional breast biopsy and roentgenographic examination for mammographically detected microcalcification. Prorok JJ; Trostle DR; Scarlato M; Rachman R Am J Surg; 1983 May; 145(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 6303142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]