These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12685720)

  • 1. Predicting ready biodegradability of premanufacture notice chemicals.
    Boethling RS; Lynch DG; Thom GC
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Apr; 22(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 12685720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Biowin, Bayes, and batteries to predict ready biodegradability.
    Boethling RS; Lynch DG; Jaworska JS; Tunkel JL; Thom GC; Webb S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Apr; 23(4):911-20. PubMed ID: 15095886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new in silico classification model for ready biodegradability, based on molecular fragments.
    Lombardo A; Pizzo F; Benfenati E; Manganaro A; Ferrari T; Gini G
    Chemosphere; 2014 Aug; 108():10-6. PubMed ID: 24875906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In silico models for predicting ready biodegradability under REACH: a comparative study.
    Pizzo F; Lombardo A; Manganaro A; Benfenati E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():161-8. PubMed ID: 23796884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External validation of structure-biodegradation relationship (SBR) models for predicting the biodegradability of xenobiotics.
    Devillers J; Pandard P; Richard B
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(12):979-93. PubMed ID: 24313438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External validation of EPIWIN biodegradation models.
    Posthumus R; Traas TP; Peijnenburg WJ; Hulzebos EM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2005; 16(1-2):135-48. PubMed ID: 15844447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of on-line chemical property estimation methods with TSCA premanufacture notice chemicals.
    Lynch DG; Tirado NF; Boethling RS; Huse GR; Thom GC
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1991 Oct; 22(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 1769354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ready biodegradation estimation methods for fragrance materials.
    Boethling R
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():60-67. PubMed ID: 25119791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representation of chemical information in OASIS centralized 3D database for existing chemicals.
    Nikolov N; Grancharov V; Stoyanova G; Pavlov T; Mekenyan O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2537-51. PubMed ID: 17125194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biodegradation of US premanufacture notice chemicals in OECD tests.
    Boethling RS; Lynch DG
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 16959293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prioritization of in silico models and molecular descriptors for the assessment of ready biodegradability.
    Fernández A; Rallo R; Giralt F
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():161-8. PubMed ID: 26160046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation and application of models for the prediction of ready biodegradability in the MITI-I test.
    Rorije E; Loonen H; Müller M; Klopman G; Peijnenburg WJ
    Chemosphere; 1999 Mar; 38(6):1409-17. PubMed ID: 10070729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating biodegradation half-lives for use in chemical screening.
    Aronson D; Boethling R; Howard P; Stiteler W
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jun; 63(11):1953-60. PubMed ID: 16297427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of in silico biodegradability screening in early drug development--a feasible approach?
    Steger-Hartmann T; Länge R; Heuck K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 May; 18(4):610-9. PubMed ID: 20981576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In silico assessment of chemical biodegradability.
    Cheng F; Ikenaga Y; Zhou Y; Yu Y; Li W; Shen J; Du Z; Chen L; Xu C; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):655-69. PubMed ID: 22332973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5.
    Auer CM; Nabholz JV; Baetcke KP
    Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():183-97. PubMed ID: 2269224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A respirometric method for the assessment of ready biodegradability: results of a ring test.
    Painter HA; King EF
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1985 Feb; 9(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 3987591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative prediction of biodegradability, metabolite distribution and toxicity of stable metabolites.
    Dimitrov S; Breton R; Macdonald D; Walker JD; Mekenyan O
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002; 13(3-4):445-55. PubMed ID: 12184386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External validation of the biodegradability prediction model CATABOL using data sets of existing and new chemicals under the Japanese Chemical Substances Control Law.
    Sakuratani Y; Yamada J; Kasai K; Noguchi Y; Nishihara T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):403-31. PubMed ID: 16272041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the validity of QSARs for ready biodegradability of chemicals: an applicability domain perspective.
    Sahigara F; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2014; 10(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 24724897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.