182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12686289)
1. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
Bott B; Hannig M
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test.
Dietschi D; Moor L
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11725685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.
Ferrari M; Dagostin A; Fabianelli A
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 12686290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays.
Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Bertelli E; Monticelli F; Grandini S; Ferrari M
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 15892362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements.
Abdalla AI; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 11764831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E
Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The marginal quality of luted ceramic inserts in bovine teeth and ceramic inlays in extracted molars after occlusal loading.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Rousson V
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 16240962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Cements at Different Temperatures on the Clinical Performance and Marginal Adaptation of Inlay-Onlay Restorations In Vivo.
Aygün Emiroğlu Ş; Evren B; Kulak Özkan Y
J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 26215702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials.
Hahn P; Schaller HG; Müllner U; Hellwig E
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):567-74. PubMed ID: 9781859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays.
Müller V; Friedl KH; Friedl K; Hahnel S; Handel G; Lang R
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):607-612. PubMed ID: 27507168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal characteristics of different filling materials and filling methods with standardized cavity preparation.
Stoll R; Remes H; Kunzelmann KH; Stachniss V
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11317400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
Rechenberg DK; Göhring TN; Attin T
J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
