182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12686289)
21. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of surface treatment on fatigue behaviour between Tetric Ceram inlays and Variolink luting composite.
Frankenberger R; Strobel WO; Baresel J; Trapper T; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Dec; 5(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 11800440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ
Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation.
Federlin M; Schmidt S; Hiller KA; Thonemann B; Schmalz G
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 15470879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays.
Ender A; Bienz S; Mörmann W; Mehl A; Attin T; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):e22-9. PubMed ID: 26723841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing.
Dietschi D; Herzfeld D
Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Dec; 106(6):1033-42. PubMed ID: 9879916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
Peumans M; Voet M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Van Ende A; Van Meerbeek B
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):739-50. PubMed ID: 22707232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
J Dent; 1994 Oct; 22(5):265-72. PubMed ID: 7962904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of prolonged thermal cycling on microleakage around Class V cavities restored with glass-ceramic inserts with different coefficients of thermal expansion: an in vitro study.
Santini A; Ivanovic V; Tan CL; Ibbetson R
Prim Dent Care; 2006 Oct; 13(4):147-53. PubMed ID: 17236570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
