207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12686290)
1. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.
Ferrari M; Dagostin A; Fabianelli A
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 12686290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays.
Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Bertelli E; Monticelli F; Grandini S; Ferrari M
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 15892362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The marginal quality of luted ceramic inserts in bovine teeth and ceramic inlays in extracted molars after occlusal loading.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Rousson V
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 16240962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro leakage of resin-bonded all-porcelain crowns.
Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Mason PN; Kugel G
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 11725671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E
Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakeage and resin cement film thickness of luted all-ceramic and gold electroformed porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns.
Jacques LB; Ferrari M; Cardoso PE
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 14964682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
Bott B; Hannig M
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
Aschenbrenner CM; Lang R; Handel G; Behr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ
Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
