207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12686290)
21. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
Rechenberg DK; Göhring TN; Attin T
J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays.
Zuellig-Singer R; Krejci I; Lutz F
J Dent Res; 1992 Nov; 71(11):1842-6. PubMed ID: 1401449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials.
Schenke F; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of marginal leakage after mechanical fatigue cycling of composite inlays luted with different cements.
Melilli D; Cumbo EM; Baldissara P; Wandscher VF; Valandro LF; Gallina G; Pizzo G
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):51-55. PubMed ID: 29964249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of Cements at Different Temperatures on the Clinical Performance and Marginal Adaptation of Inlay-Onlay Restorations In Vivo.
Aygün Emiroğlu Ş; Evren B; Kulak Özkan Y
J Prosthodont; 2016 Jun; 25(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 26215702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Resch U
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 10530275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
Peumans M; Voet M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Van Ende A; Van Meerbeek B
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):739-50. PubMed ID: 22707232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: an SEM investigation.
Ferrari M; Vichi A; Grandini S; Goracci C
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 12066701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent.
Behr M; Hansmann M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 19225814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
