These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12686908)

  • 1. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis].
    Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces.
    Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces.
    Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip.
    Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ
    J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces.
    Baek SH; Shon WJ; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee WC; Park YS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study.
    Rühling A; Kocher T; Kreusch J; Plagmann HC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8038341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments on cell attachment.
    Dmytryk JJ; Fox SC; Moriarty JD
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):491-6. PubMed ID: 2202808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment with various ultrasonic scaler tips affects efficiency of brushing of SLA titanium discs.
    Park JB; Jang YJ; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e119-23. PubMed ID: 23524804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation.
    Parham PL; Cobb CM; French AA; Love JW; Drisko CL; Killoy WJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 2640245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on titanium discs: a microscopy and trace elemental analysis in vitro study.
    Tawse-Smith A; Atieh MA; Tompkins G; Duncan WJ; Reid MR; Stirling CH
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 26094557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SEM evaluation of the in-vitro effects of an air-abrasive system on various implant surfaces.
    Barnes CM; Fleming LS; Mueninghoff LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 1820316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of implant curets on titanium implant surfaces.
    Cross-Poline GN; Shaklee RL; Stach DJ
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9545920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.