These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Trauma Pod: a semi-automated telerobotic surgical system. Garcia P; Rosen J; Kapoor C; Noakes M; Elbert G; Treat M; Ganous T; Hanson M; Manak J; Hasser C; Rohler D; Satava R Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 19222048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robin Heart 2003--present state of the Polish telemanipulator project for cardiac surgery assistance. Nawrat Z; Podsedkowski L; Mianowski K; Wróblewski P; Kostka P; Pruski R; Małota Z; Religa Z Int J Artif Organs; 2003 Dec; 26(12):1115-9. PubMed ID: 14738195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical application of a new robotic system for paranasal sinus surgery. Steinhart H; Bumm K; Wurm J; Vogele M; Iro H Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2004 Apr; 113(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 15112974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of robotic surgical system in the management of vascular disease. Lin JC Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 27(7):976-83. PubMed ID: 23849652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery. Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A review of surgical robots for spinal interventions. Bertelsen A; Melo J; Sánchez E; Borro D Int J Med Robot; 2013 Dec; 9(4):407-22. PubMed ID: 23239581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. New augmented reality and robotic based methods for head-surgery. Wörn H; Aschke M; Kahrs LA Int J Med Robot; 2005 Sep; 1(3):49-56. PubMed ID: 17518390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic surgical systems. Franklin B Biomed Instrum Technol; 2006; 40(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 17190087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Contact force measurement of instruments for force-feedback on a surgical robot: acceleration force cancellations based on acceleration sensor readings. Shimachi S; Kameyama F; Hakozaki Y; Fujiwara Y Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):97-104. PubMed ID: 16685948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotics in keyhole transcranial endoscope-assisted microsurgery: a critical review of existing systems and proposed specifications for new robotic platforms. Marcus HJ; Seneci CA; Payne CJ; Nandi D; Darzi A; Yang GZ Neurosurgery; 2014 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():84-95; discussion 95-6. PubMed ID: 23921708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotics in Dental Implantology. Wu Y; Wang F; Fan S; Chow JK Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Aug; 31(3):513-518. PubMed ID: 31103316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A cyber-physical management system for delivering and monitoring surgical instruments in the OR. Li YT; Jacob M; Akingba G; Wachs JP Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 23037804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lapabot: a compact telesurgical robot system for minimally invasive surgery: part I. System description. Choi J; Park JW; Kim DJ; Shin J; Park CY; Lee JC; Jo YH Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2012 May; 21(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 21745135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A vision guided hybrid robotic prototype system for stereotactic surgery. Wei J; Wang T; Liu D Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 21984231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Efficiency, risks, and advantages of using robotic support systems in interventional medicine]. Feussner H; Can S; Fiolka A; Schneider A; Wilhelm D Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Aug; 53(8):831-8. PubMed ID: 20700783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]