These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Fee-for-service physician payment: analysis of current methods and their development. Showstack JA; Blumberg BD; Schwartz J; Schroeder SA Inquiry; 1979; 16(3):230-46. PubMed ID: 157331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who's your biggest payer? Like it or not, it's managed care. Preston SH Med Econ; 2000 Dec; 77(23):130-4, 136, 138. PubMed ID: 11155563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who says doctors can't live with negotiated fees. Peck RL Med Econ; 1979 Dec; 56(26):131, 134-6, 141. PubMed ID: 10245949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dueling interpretations: ER v. specialists. Cassidy MA Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Oct; ():10-4. PubMed ID: 11142226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reimbursement: what every nurse needs to know. Bashford C; Carson A Ohio Nurses Rev; 2000 Jan; 75(1):11-4; quiz 15. PubMed ID: 12017716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Negotiating reimbursement contracts: the Michigan experience. Munson FC; Williams SN Health Care Manage Rev; 1977; 2(4):73-81. PubMed ID: 10305190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Practical implementation of globally priced episodes of care: lessons learned from Oxford's specialty management program. Emery DW Manag Care Q; 1999; 7(2):31-8. PubMed ID: 10537637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The tinkering with RBRVS begins. Kirchner M Med Econ; 1989 Aug; 66(15):104-8, 110, 113-6 passim. PubMed ID: 10303734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What the Texas-Aetna agreement really means. Guglielmo WJ Med Econ; 2000 Sep; 77(17):172-4, 179-80. PubMed ID: 11066767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pennsylvania docs lobby for power to negotiate with insurers. Capitation Manag Rep; 2000 Sep; 7(9):141-3, 129. PubMed ID: 11186345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Legal liability of the medical director for coding errors]. Müller NH Urologe A; 2003 Apr; 42(4):505-8. PubMed ID: 12830801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Michigan MDs settle dispute with Blue plans. Am Med News; 1978 May; 21(21):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10325032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The RB-RVS challenge. An opportunity for equality. Ogrod ES Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):30-3. PubMed ID: 10303708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic efficiency of gate-keeping compared with fee for service plans: a Swiss example. Schwenkglenks M; Preiswerk G; Lehner R; Weber F; Szucs TD J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Jan; 60(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 16361451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kentucky takes on Aetna's doc policy. Moskowitz DB Bus Health; 1999 Jul; 17(7):43-4. PubMed ID: 10539171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]