240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12688299)
1. Stem cell research: the laws of nations and a proposal for international guidelines.
Ayer AC
Conn J Int Law; 2002; 17(2):393-428. PubMed ID: 12688299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Draft National Institutes of Health guidelines for research involving human pluripotent stem cells (December 1999).
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1999 Dec; 64(231):67576-9. PubMed ID: 11660715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Embryonic stem cell research: will President Bush's limitation on federal funding put the United States at a disadvantage? A comparison between U.S. and international law.
Stevens D
Houst J Int Law; 2003; 25(3):623-53. PubMed ID: 15199940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons learned from Great Britain's Human Fertilization and Embryology Act: should the United States regulate the fate of unused frozen embryos?
Kuo L
Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1997 Aug; 19(4):1027-53. PubMed ID: 11660675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
Stenger RL
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos.
George EP
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Administrative developments: NIH backs federal funding for stem cell research.
Biven M
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 11657149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
Gregoratos B
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The embryo bill.
Cameron NM
Ethics Med; 1989; 5(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 11650335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryonic stem cells. Court asked to declare NIH guidelines legal.
Vogel G
Science; 2001 May; 292(5521):1463. PubMed ID: 11379608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stem cell division: abortion law and its influence on the adoption of radically different embryonic stem cell legislation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Belew KL
Tex Int Law J; 2004; 39(3):479-519. PubMed ID: 16514771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Shots in the dark for infertility.
Vines G
New Sci; 1993 Nov; 140(1901):13-4. PubMed ID: 11656286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Politics, culture, and the lab: public attitudes toward animals and human embryonic stem cells have fostered different research agendas in Britain and the United States.
Borrego AM
Chron High Educ; 2005 Mar; 51(27):A43-5. PubMed ID: 15835079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
Great Britain
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The UK model: setting the standard for embryonic stem cell research?
Herder M
Health Law Rev; 2001; 10(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 15739306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis.
Gross GS
Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The British law on assisted reproduction: a liberal law by comparison with many other European laws.
Sutton A
Ethics Med; 1996; 12(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 11660744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Government says ban on human embryo research does not apply to cells.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jan; ():A29. PubMed ID: 11648094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Politicians squabble over stem-cell research.
Rovner J
Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1948. PubMed ID: 11660637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
