148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12689532)
1. Increased risk of cervical canal infections with intracervical Foley catheter.
Siddiqui S; Zuberi NF; Zafar A; Qureshi RN
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Mar; 13(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 12689532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical ripening: how long can the Foley catheter safely remain in the cervical canal?
Ekele BA; Isah AY
Afr J Reprod Health; 2002 Dec; 6(3):98-102. PubMed ID: 12685414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth.
Sciscione A; Larkin M; O'Shea A; Pollock M; Hoffman M; Colmorgen G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 15042009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased risk of cervical canal infections with intracervical foley catheter.
Mahmood A; Butt T
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Nov; 13(11):675; author reply 675-6. PubMed ID: 14700503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new insertion technique for the transcervical Foley catheter used for cervical ripening.
Erekson EA; Myles TD; Amon E
J Reprod Med; 2008 Mar; 53(3):188-90. PubMed ID: 18441723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of pain in women randomly allocated to speculum or digital insertion of the Foley catheter for induction of labor.
Jonsson M; Hellgren C; Wiberg-Itzel E; Akerud H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):997-1004. PubMed ID: 21615714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
Al-Taani MI
East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of dinoprostone, intracervical foleys and misoprostol in labor induction.
Saleem S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2006 Apr; 16(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 16624192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effectiveness of intracervical catheter as a labor preinduction method].
Patro-Małysza J; Marciniak B; Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B; Bartosiewicz J; Oleszczuk J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20232696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Pettker CM; Pocock SB; Smok DP; Lee SM; Devine PC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1320-6. PubMed ID: 18515515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening.
Levy R; Kanengiser B; Furman B; Ben Arie A; Brown D; Hagay ZJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1632-6. PubMed ID: 15547534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study.
Jozwiak M; van de Lest HA; Burger NB; Dijksterhuis MG; De Leeuw JW
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Mar; 93(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 24354335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
