These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12689791)

  • 21. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies.
    Hepler AB; Weir BS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 19079769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Interpretation of DNA profiles for mixed stains].
    Lu DJ; Lu HL; Chen YC
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 18(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 12608297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Properties of the molecular-genetic individual identification system on the basis of D1S111 locus in terms of forensic-expert typing of DNA].
    Efremov IA; Lebedeva NN; Zemskova EIu; Ivanov PL
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2005; 48(5):29-33. PubMed ID: 16279497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile.
    Egeland T; Dalen I; Mostad PF
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Oct; 117(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 12920529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The calculation of DNA match probabilities in mixed race populations.
    Triggs C; Harbison SA; Buckleton J
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10795427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Forensic mitochondrial DNA analysis: two years of commercial casework experience in the United States.
    Melton T; Nelson K
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 11387643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of the LUS in sequence allele designations to facilitate probabilistic genotyping of NGS-based STR typing results.
    Just RS; Irwin JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():197-205. PubMed ID: 29525576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The 'factor of two' issue in mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():300-6. PubMed ID: 25158162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forensic DNA typing by the solid-phase minisequencing method.
    Syvänen AC; Sajantila A; Lukka M
    EXS; 1993; 67():275-82. PubMed ID: 8400698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.