These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12689791)

  • 41. Post-conviction DNA testing: the UK's first 'exoneration' case?
    Johnson P; Williams R
    Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15112595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Validation of an STR peak area model.
    Cowell RG
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Jun; 3(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19414168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of forensic DNA evidence in prosecutors'offices.
    Prottas JM; Noble AA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 17518857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Basic issues in forensic DNA typing.
    Schneider PM
    Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Jul; 88(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9251228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. PACE: Probabilistic Assessment for Contributor Estimation- A machine learning-based assessment of the number of contributors in DNA mixtures.
    Marciano MA; Adelman JD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():82-91. PubMed ID: 28040630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
    Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search.
    Stockmarr A
    Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):671-7. PubMed ID: 11314992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The a posteriori probability of the number of contributors when conditioned on an assumed contributor.
    Grgicak CM; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102563. PubMed ID: 34284325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The prosecutor's and defendant's Bayesian nomograms.
    Riancho JA; Zarrabeitia MT
    Int J Legal Med; 2002 Oct; 116(5):312-3. PubMed ID: 12376846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessment of PCR of the D17S30 locus for forensic identification.
    Ivey JN; Atchison BA; Georgalis AM
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 8113713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. DNA mixtures: biostatistics for mixed stains with haplotypic genetic markers.
    Fukshansky N; Bär W
    Int J Legal Med; 2005 Sep; 119(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15717201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Utilization of complex technologies of molecular genetics for forensic expert identification of unidentified remains of victims of terrorist acts in Moscow in 1999].
    Ivanov PL; Zharov VV; Frolova SA; Ryseva EV; Kolmakova MA; Trusova GR; Tomilin VV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2002; 45(4):13-29. PubMed ID: 12380442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Application of DIP-STRs to sexual/physical assault investigations: Eight case reports.
    Oldoni F; Castella V; Hall D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():106-113. PubMed ID: 28700963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of allelic dropout on evidential value of forensic DNA profiles using RMNE.
    Van Nieuwerburgh F; Goetghebeur E; Vandewoestyne M; Deforce D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 19029128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. DNA profiling of trace DNA recovered from bedding.
    Petricevic SF; Bright JA; Cockerton SL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16046091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Melting curve SNP (McSNP) genotyping: a useful approach for diallelic genotyping in forensic science.
    Ye J; Parra EJ; Sosnoski DM; Hiester K; Underhill PA; Shriver MD
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 12051343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The primary investigation of material evidence and the evaluation of its suitability for expert biological identification by genomic "dactyloscopy"].
    Boldesku NG; Gyské LI; Gurtovaia SV; Ivanov PL
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1990; 33(4):11-4. PubMed ID: 2087742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.