798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12691276)
1. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
Desai PD; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements.
Ortega VL; Pegoraro LF; Conti PC; do Valle AL; Bonfante G
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 15089948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups.
Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ
Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance and microtensile bond strength of maxillary premolars restored with two resin composite inlay systems.
Sun YS; Chen YM; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 18578176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
