These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

799 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12691276)

  • 21. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
    Trope M; Tronstad L
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
    Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Indirect composite preparation width and depth and tooth fracture resistance.
    Watts DC; Wilson NH; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 1995 Feb; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7546466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.
    Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different filling techniques.
    França FM; Worschech CC; Paulillo LA; Martins LR; Lovadino JR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Aug; 6(3):62-9. PubMed ID: 16127473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture strength of restored premolars.
    Camacho GB; Gonçalves M; Nonaka T; Osório AB
    Am J Dent; 2007 Apr; 20(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 17542207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage.
    Coelho-De-Souza FH; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 18335731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth.
    Daneshkazemi AR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Aug; 5(3):51-8. PubMed ID: 15318256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Resin composite polyethylene fiber reinforcement: effect on fracture resistance of weakened marginal ridges.
    Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 20718208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of ceramic inlays and composite fillings on fracture resistance of premolars in vitro.
    Ragauska A; Apse P; Kasjanovs V; Berzina-Cimdina L
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):121-6. PubMed ID: 19223711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.