These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job. Rogers WA; Fisk AD; McLaughlin AC; Pak R Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):271-88. PubMed ID: 16170938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time Sharing Between Robotics and Process Control: Validating a Model of Attention Switching. Wickens CD; Gutzwiller RS; Vieane A; Clegg BA; Sebok A; Janes J Hum Factors; 2016 Mar; 58(2):322-43. PubMed ID: 26772605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced perception and performance by multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle. Oskarsson PA; Eriksson L; Carlander O Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 22409107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of tactile feedback on movement speed and precision during work-related tasks using a computer mouse. Viau A; Najm M; Chapman CE; Levin MF Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):816-26. PubMed ID: 16553068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction. Lin CY; Hsu CC Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles. Jakus G; Dicke C; Sodnik J Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():184-92. PubMed ID: 25151313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech-based E-mail and driver behavior: effects of an in-vehicle message system interface. Jamson AH; Westerman SJ; Hockey GR; Carsten OM Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 15709325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal expectation in focal hand dystonia. Avanzino L; Martino D; Martino I; Pelosin E; Vicario CM; Bove M; Defazio G; Abbruzzese G Brain; 2013 Feb; 136(Pt 2):444-54. PubMed ID: 23361064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer's disease. Logie RH; Cocchini G; Delia Sala S; Baddeley AD Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 15291728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of tasks and users' characteristics on virtual reality performance. Tyndiuk F; Lespinet-Najib V; Thomas G; Schlick C Cyberpsychol Behav; 2007 Jun; 10(3):444-52. PubMed ID: 17594269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry? He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing two types of navigational interfaces for Virtual Reality. Teixeira L; Vilar E; Duarte E; Rebelo F; da Silva FM Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2195-200. PubMed ID: 22317041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three-dimensional path-tracing task. Sollenberger RL; Milgram P Hum Factors; 1993 Sep; 35(3):483-99. PubMed ID: 8244411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interacting with notebook input devices: an analysis of motor performance and users' expertise. Sutter C; Ziefle M Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):169-87. PubMed ID: 15960095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]