405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12691377)
1. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.
Ratliff JK; Cooper PR
J Neurosurg; 2003 Apr; 98(3 Suppl):230-8. PubMed ID: 12691377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.
Houten JK; Cooper PR
Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion.
Yuan W; Zhu Y; Liu X; Zhu H; Zhou X; Zhou R; Cui C; Li J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 134():17-23. PubMed ID: 25929463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?
Fujimori T; Le H; Ziewacz JE; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(1):E9. PubMed ID: 23815254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The dorsal approach in degeneratively changed cervical spine].
Yonenobu K; Wada E; Suzuki S; Kanazawa A
Orthopade; 1996 Nov; 25(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 8999408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Discussion of surgical indications for posterior expansive open-door laminoplasty extended to C1 level].
Li Q; Kong Q; Zhang L; Sun T; Li T; Gong Q; Song Y; Liu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1214-20. PubMed ID: 24397134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cervical laminoplasty--review of surgical techniques, indications, methods of efficacy evaluation, and complications].
Derenda M; Kowalina I
Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2006; 40(5):422-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 17103356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
Zhang H; Sun T; Lu S; Li Q; Yadav SK
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 23167101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical laminoplasty developments and trends, 2003-2013: a systematic review.
Duetzmann S; Cole T; Ratliff JK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 25909270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skip laminectomy--a new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving bilateral muscular attachments to the spinous processes: a preliminary report.
Shiraishi T
Spine J; 2002; 2(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 14588269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postlaminoplasty cervical range of motion: early results.
Kang SH; Rhim SC; Roh SW; Jeon SR; Baek HC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 May; 6(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 17542502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
Maruo K; Moriyama T; Tachibana T; Inoue S; Arizumi F; Daimon T; Yoshiya S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament.
Hirabayashi K; Toyama Y; Chiba K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Feb; (359):35-48. PubMed ID: 10078127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
Highsmith JM; Dhall SS; Haid RW; Rodts GE; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study.
Wang LN; Wang L; Song YM; Yang X; Liu LM; Li T
Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1267-74. PubMed ID: 27087625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.
Seichi A; Takeshita K; Ohishi I; Kawaguchi H; Akune T; Anamizu Y; Kitagawa T; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 11242374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of tension-band laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: a ten-year follow-up.
Motosuneya T; Maruyama T; Yamada H; Tsuzuki N; Sakai H
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21196546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.
Yoon ST; Hashimoto RE; Raich A; Shaffrey CI; Rhee JM; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S183-94. PubMed ID: 23963000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcome of laminectomy for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Lee SE; Chung CK; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 May; 18(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 23452249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
