These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12692473)

  • 1. Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response.
    Galbraith GC; Olfman DM; Huffman TM
    Neuroreport; 2003 Apr; 14(5):735-8. PubMed ID: 12692473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective attention and brainstem frequency-following responses.
    Galbraith GC; Arroyo C
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Oct; 37(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 8110920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem frequency-following and behavioral responses during selective attention to pure tone and missing fundamental stimuli.
    Galbraith GC; Doan BQ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1995 Apr; 19(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 7558987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlated brain stem and cortical evoked responses to auditory tone change.
    Galbraith GC; Gutterson RP; Levy DS; Mussey JL; Sabatasso FA; Wasserman RI
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(17):2613-6. PubMed ID: 15570162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-correlation and latency compensation analysis of click-evoked and frequency-following brain-stem responses in man.
    Galbraith GC; Brown WS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 1695141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of attention on the auditory evoked potentials recorded from the vertex (ABR) and the promontory (CAP) of human listeners.
    Kuk FK; Abbas PJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 2739888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem, and cerebral evoked potentials.
    Hackley SA; Woldorff M; Hillyard SA
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Mar; 27(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 2247550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The topography of the afferent and efferent flows in the mechanisms of auditory selective attention].
    Shostak VI; Lytaev SA; Golubeva LV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1994; 44(4-5):665-73. PubMed ID: 7810208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brainstem frequency-following responses and cortical event-related potentials during attention.
    Galbraith GC; Kane JM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1231-41. PubMed ID: 8337070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention.
    de Jong R; Toffanin P; Harbers M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 19819271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensory and movement-related cortical potentials in nociceptive and auditory reaction time tasks.
    Tarkka IM; Treede RD; Bromm B
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1992 Oct; 86(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 1455981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual processing affects the neural basis of auditory discrimination.
    Kislyuk DS; Möttönen R; Sams M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2175-84. PubMed ID: 18457500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brainstem auditory-evoked response in the rat. Normative studies, with observations concerning the effects of ossicular disruption.
    Burkard R; Feldman M; Voigt HF
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):146-62. PubMed ID: 2383214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: correlates of low pitch auditory perception in humans.
    Marsh JT; Brown WS; Smith JC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Feb; 38(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 45941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity.
    Alho K; Escera C; Díaz R; Yago E; Serra JM
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3233-7. PubMed ID: 9351649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.