These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12693194)

  • 1. Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: frequency or nested sets?
    Yamagishi K
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 12693194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intuitive reasoning about probability: theoretical and experimental analyses of the "problem of three prisoners".
    Shimojo S; Ichikawa SI
    Cognition; 1989 Jun; 32(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2752704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A; Lindskog M
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):248-67. PubMed ID: 21640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different developmental patterns of simple deductive and probabilistic inferential reasoning.
    Markovits H; Thompson V
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1066-78. PubMed ID: 18927025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not.
    Hoffrage U; Gigerenzer G; Krauss S; Martignon L
    Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 12044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks.
    Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 14738516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dilution and confirmation of probability judgments based on nondiagnostic evidence.
    LaBella C; Koehler DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1076-89. PubMed ID: 15813491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: a conflict between predictiveness and coherence.
    Lagnado DA; Shanks DR
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 11814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency of judgment as a context-like determinant of predictive judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Vegas S; Matute H
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1065-75. PubMed ID: 15813490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Perham N; Over DE; Thompson VA
    Cognition; 2000 Dec; 77(3):197-213. PubMed ID: 11018509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The probability of causal conditionals.
    Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasoning about conjunctive probabilistic concepts in childhood.
    Fisk JE; Slattery R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Sep; 59(3):168-78. PubMed ID: 16248496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Children's understanding of posterior probability.
    Girotto V; Gonzalez M
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):325-44. PubMed ID: 17391661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [When generative and preventive mechanisms meet with compatible and incompatible information in casual reasoning probability].
    Desrochers S; Walsh S; Sacy M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 22506877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.