These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12693741)

  • 21. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
    DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploratory assessments of child abuse: children's responses to interviewer's questions across multiple interview sessions.
    Patterson T; Pipe ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2009 Aug; 33(8):490-504. PubMed ID: 19766310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of drawing on children's accounts of sexual abuse.
    Katz C; Hershkowitz I
    Child Maltreat; 2010 May; 15(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19926626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Police interviews with child sexual abuse victims: patterns of reporting, avoidance and denial.
    Leander L
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Mar; 34(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 20206999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forensic Interviewers' Difficulty With Invitations: Faux Invitations and Negative Recasting.
    Henderson HM; Russo N; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2020 Aug; 25(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 31876172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Props and children's event reports: the impact of a 1-year delay.
    Salmon K; Pipe ME
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):261-92. PubMed ID: 9178961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability of retrospective assessments of childhood experiences in Germany.
    Hardt J; Sidor A; Bracko M; Egle UT
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Sep; 194(9):676-83. PubMed ID: 16971819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The reality of recovered memories: corroborating continuous and discontinuous memories of childhood sexual abuse.
    Geraerts E; Schooler JW; Merckelbach H; Jelicic M; Hauer BJ; Ambadar Z
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):564-8. PubMed ID: 17614862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interviewing children about past events: the influence of peer support and misleading questions.
    Greenstock J; Pipe ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Jan; 20(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 8640428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reducing misinformation effects in older adults with cognitive interview mnemonics.
    Holliday RE; Humphries JE; Milne R; Memon A; Houlder L; Lyons A; Bull R
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1191-203. PubMed ID: 21443347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of promising to tell the truth, the putative confession, and recall and recognition questions on maltreated and non-maltreated children's disclosure of a minor transgression.
    Quas JA; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():266-279. PubMed ID: 28950167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sexual abuse and preschoolers: Forensic details in regard of question types.
    Gagnon K; Cyr M
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 May; 67():109-118. PubMed ID: 28254688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working with avoidant children: a clinical challenge.
    Berson N; Meisburger D
    Child Welfare; 1998; 77(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 9666553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognitive interviewing procedures and suggestibility in children's recall.
    Hayes BK; Delamothe K
    J Appl Psychol; 1997 Aug; 82(4):562-77. PubMed ID: 9378684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Describing individual incidents of sexual abuse: a review of research on the effects of multiple sources of information on children's reports.
    Roberts KP; Powell MB
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Dec; 25(12):1643-59. PubMed ID: 11814161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls.
    Katz SM; Schonfeld DJ; Carter AS; Leventhal JM; Cicchetti DV
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1995 Apr; 16(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 7790517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Setting course: the case for the credentialing of forensic interviewers.
    Haney M; Vieth VI; Campos HM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Nov; 19(6):709-27. PubMed ID: 21113836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Children's suggestibility for an instance of a repeated event versus a unique event: the effect of degree of association between variable details.
    Connolly DA; Price HL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Mar; 93(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 16111696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews.
    Memon A; Wark L; Holley A; Bull R; Koehnken G
    Memory; 1997 Sep; 5(5):639-56. PubMed ID: 9415325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of anatomical dolls as a demonstration aid in child sexual abuse interviews: a study of forensic interviewers' perceptions.
    Hlavka HR; Olinger SD; Lashley JL
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):519-53. PubMed ID: 20924909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.