BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12693877)

  • 1. Eliciting willingness to pay: comparing closed-ended with open-ended and payment scale formats.
    Frew EJ; Whynes DK; Wolstenholme JL
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 12693877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two methods for eliciting contingent valuations of colorectal cancer screening.
    Whynes DK; Frew E; Wolstenholme JL
    J Health Econ; 2003 Jul; 22(4):555-74. PubMed ID: 12842315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing willingness-to-pay: bidding game format versus open-ended and payment scale formats.
    Frew EJ; Wolstenholme JL; Whynes DK
    Health Policy; 2004 Jun; 68(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 15113640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Willingness to pay for a hearing aid: comparing the payment scale and open-ended question.
    Grutters JP; Anteunis LJ; Chenault MN; Joore MA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 19239587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of range bias in contingent valuation payment scales.
    Whynes DK; Wolstenholme JL; Frew E
    Health Econ; 2004 Feb; 13(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 14737755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Willingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screening.
    Frew E; Wolstenholme JL; Whynes DK
    Eur J Cancer; 2001 Sep; 37(14):1746-51. PubMed ID: 11549427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Framing the willingness-to-pay question: impact on response patterns and mean willingness to pay.
    Gyrd-Hansen D; Jensen ML; Kjaer T
    Health Econ; 2014 May; 23(5):550-63. PubMed ID: 23696155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can a Circular Payment Card Format Effectively Elicit Preferences? Evidence From a Survey on a Mandatory Health Insurance Scheme in Tunisia.
    Chanel O; Makhloufi K; Abu-Zaineh M
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 15(3):385-398. PubMed ID: 27798795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the monetary value of a quality-adjusted life year from the payment card and the open-ended format.
    Ye Z; Liu F; Ma J; Zhou Z; Wang C; Sun L
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2021 Jul; 19(1):45. PubMed ID: 34281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Willingness to pay and the sensitivity of willingness to pay for interdisciplinary musculoskeletal clinics: a contingent valuation study in Quebec, Canada.
    Poder TG; He J
    Int J Health Econ Manag; 2016 Dec; 16(4):337-361. PubMed ID: 27878690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of four contingent valuation methods to estimate the economic value of a pneumococcal vaccine in Bangladesh.
    Heinzen RR; Bridges JF
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):481-7. PubMed ID: 18828944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes.
    Bijlenga D; Bonsel GJ; Birnie E
    Health Econ; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1392-406. PubMed ID: 20967891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the construct validity of willingness to pay valuations using objective information about risk and health benefit.
    Philips Z; Whynes DK; Avis M
    Health Econ; 2006 Feb; 15(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 16229053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of the design of payment scales on the willingness to pay for health gains.
    Soeteman L; van Exel J; Bobinac A
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Jul; 18(6):743-760. PubMed ID: 27623946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting patient valuations of caries prevention: Using and validating the willingness to pay method.
    Vernazza CR; Wildman JR; Steele JG; Whitworth JM; Walls AW; Perry R; Matthews R; Hahn P; Donaldson C
    J Dent; 2015 Aug; 43(8):981-8. PubMed ID: 26054234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valuing Mobile Health: An Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey of a National Digital Health Program.
    Somers C; Grieve E; Lennon M; Bouamrane MM; Mair FS; McIntosh E
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e3. PubMed ID: 30664488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical implications of response acquiescence in discrete-choice contingent valuation.
    Yeung RY; Smith RD; Ho LM; Johnston JM; Leung GM
    Health Econ; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1077-89. PubMed ID: 16518835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Howard K; Salkeld G
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients' willingness to pay for dental services in a population with limited restorative services.
    Nyamuryekung'e KK; Lahti SM; Tuominen RJ
    Community Dent Health; 2018 Aug; 35(3):167-172. PubMed ID: 30106521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year: the individual perspective.
    Bobinac A; Van Exel NJ; Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
    Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):1046-55. PubMed ID: 20825620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.