These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12694106)

  • 1. Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Comparison with intraarterial DSA.
    Steffens JC; Schäfer FK; Oberscheid B; Link J; Jahnke T; Heller M; Brossmann J
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Mar; 44(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 12694106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
    Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid peripheral 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of calf and foot vasculature.
    Tongdee R; Narra VR; McNeal G; Hildebolt CF; El-Merhi F; Foster G; Brown JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1746-53. PubMed ID: 16714669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
    Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
    Partovi S; Rasmus M; Schulte AC; Rengier F; Jacob AL; Aschwanden M; Karmonik C; Bongartz G; Bilecen D
    MAGMA; 2013 Jun; 26(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 23117342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography.
    Cronberg CN; Sjöberg S; Albrechtsson U; Leander P; Lindh M; Norgren L; Danielsson P; Sonesson B; Larsson EM
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12631001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of auto-moving table contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA and iodinated contrast-enhanced DSA for evaluating the lower-extremity arteries.
    Ho CF; Wu MH; Wu HM; Chang CY; Chen MC; Chou TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2004 Oct; 67(10):511-20. PubMed ID: 15648286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncontrast MR angiography (MRA) of infragenual arteries using flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD)-prepared steady-state free precession (SSFP) at 3.0 Tesla: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Bi X; Zhao Y; An J; Liu J; Chen Z; Fan Z; Li D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 26185106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D non-contrast-enhanced ECG-gated MR angiography of the lower extremities with dual-source radiofrequency transmission at 3.0 T: Intraindividual comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in PAOD patients.
    Rasper M; Wildgruber M; Settles M; Eckstein HH; Zimmermann A; Reeps C; Rummeny EJ; Huber AM
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):2871-80. PubMed ID: 26560724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses.
    de Vries M; de Koning PJ; de Haan MW; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Nijenhuis RJ; Planken RN; Vasbinder GB; van Engelshoven JM; van der Geest RJ; Leiner T
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Aug; 40(8):495-503. PubMed ID: 16024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model.
    Bley TA; François CJ; Schiebler ML; Wieben O; Takei N; Brittain JH; Del Rio AM; Grist TM; Reeder SB
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 26017736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unmasking pedal arteries in patients with critical ischemia using time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA.
    Langer S; Krämer N; Mommertz G; Koeppel TA; Jacobs MJ; Wazirie NA; Ocklenburg C; Spüntrup E
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1196-202. PubMed ID: 19394548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
    Lin J; Li D; Yan F
    Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pedal artery imaging--a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound.
    Hofmann WJ; Forstner R; Kofler B; Binder K; Ugurluoglu A; Magometschnigg H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 24(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 12323169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
    Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.