146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12694110)
1. Comparison of preoperative simultaneous stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy and stereotactic core needle biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Leifland K; Lundquist H; Lagerstedt U; Svane G
Acta Radiol; 2003 Mar; 44(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 12694110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is core needle biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions?
Masood S; Loya A; Khalbuss W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 12768640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flat ductal intraepithelial neoplasia 1A diagnosed at stereotactic core needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy indicated?
Becker AK; Gordon PB; Harrison DA; Hassell PR; Hayes MM; van Niekerk D; Wilson CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 23436863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stereotactic fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in 522 non-palpable breast lesions.
Leifland K; Lagerstedt U; Svane G
Acta Radiol; 2003 Jul; 44(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 12846688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?
Foster MC; Helvie MA; Gregory NE; Rebner M; Nees AV; Paramagul C
Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):813-9. PubMed ID: 15105449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unsuccessful preoperative biopsies, fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy, lead to increased costs in the diagnostic workup in breast cancer.
Hukkinen K; Kivisaari L; Heikkilä PS; Von Smitten K; Leidenius M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(6):1037-45. PubMed ID: 18607862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle.
Sohn V; Arthurs Z; Herbert G; Keylock J; Perry J; Eckert M; Fellabaum D; Smith D; Brown T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):2497-501. PubMed ID: 17564749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ.
Takada K; Kashiwagi S; Asano Y; Goto W; Morisaki T; Takahashi K; Fujita H; Takashima T; Tomita S; Hirakawa K; Ohira M
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):513. PubMed ID: 32493410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Borderline atypical ductal hyperplasia/low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ on breast needle core biopsy should be managed conservatively.
Vandenbussche CJ; Khouri N; Sbaity E; Tsangaris TN; Vang R; Tatsas A; Cimino-Mathews A; Argani P
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Jun; 37(6):913-23. PubMed ID: 23598968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core-needle biopsy, and evaluation of combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Hatada T; Ishii H; Ichii S; Okada K; Fujiwara Y; Yamamura T
J Am Coll Surg; 2000 Mar; 190(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 10703854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative breast MRI positively impacts surgical outcomes of needle biopsy-diagnosed pure DCIS: a patient-matched analysis from the MIPA study.
Cozzi A; Di Leo G; Houssami N; Gilbert FJ; Helbich TH; Álvarez Benito M; Balleyguier C; Bazzocchi M; Bult P; Calabrese M; Camps Herrero J; Cartia F; Cassano E; Clauser P; de Lima Docema MF; Depretto C; Dominelli V; Forrai G; Girometti R; Harms SE; Hilborne S; Ienzi R; Lobbes MBI; Losio C; Mann RM; Montemezzi S; Obdeijn IM; Aksoy Ozcan U; Pediconi F; Pinker K; Preibsch H; Raya Povedano JL; Rossi Saccarelli C; Sacchetto D; Scaperrotta GP; Schlooz M; Szabó BK; Taylor DB; Ulus SÖ; Van Goethem M; Veltman J; Weigel S; Wenkel E; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3970-3980. PubMed ID: 37999727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy does not always mandate excisional biopsy.
Srour MK; Donovan C; Chung A; Harit A; Dadmanesh F; Giuliano AE; Amersi F
Breast J; 2020 Apr; 26(4):679-684. PubMed ID: 31562689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative features of comedo and noncomedo ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Malamud YR; Ducatman BS; Wang HH
Diagn Cytopathol; 1992; 8(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 1334826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy.
Chae BJ; Lee A; Song BJ; Jung SS
World J Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 7():77. PubMed ID: 19852801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benign breast papillomas without atypia diagnosed with core needle biopsy: Outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.
Polat DS; Knippa EE; Ganti R; Seiler SJ; Goudreau SH
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109237. PubMed ID: 32905954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative features of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Wang HH; Ducatman BS; Eick D
Am J Clin Pathol; 1989 Dec; 92(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 2556017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of residual invasive disease after core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rutstein LA; Johnson RR; Poller WR; Dabbs D; Groblewski J; Rakitt T; Tsung A; Kirchner T; Sumkin J; Keenan D; Soran A; Ahrendt G; Falk JS
Breast J; 2007; 13(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 17461899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-operative simultaneous stereotactic core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma.
Leifland K; Lundquist H; Måre K; Erhardt K; Fernstad R
Acta Radiol; 2000 Jan; 41(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10665872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
