These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12694364)

  • 1. Methods developed to elucidate nursing related adverse events in Japan.
    Yamagishi M; Kanda K; Takemura Y
    J Nurs Manag; 2003 May; 11(3):168-76. PubMed ID: 12694364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of human reliability analysis to nursing errors in hospitals.
    Inoue K; Koizumi A
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1459-73. PubMed ID: 15660604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the nature of errors in nursing: using a model to analyse critical incident reports of errors which had resulted in an adverse or potentially adverse event.
    Meurier CE
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Jul; 32(1):202-7. PubMed ID: 10886452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse patient occurrences as a measure of nursing care quality.
    Reed L; Blegen MA; Goode CS
    J Nurs Adm; 1998 May; 28(5):62-9. PubMed ID: 9601494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nursing unit characteristics and patient outcomes.
    Boyle SM
    Nurs Econ; 2004; 22(3):111-9, 123, 107. PubMed ID: 15211913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating medication errors.
    Cobb MD
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Oct; 21(10):925-9. PubMed ID: 10278983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The occurrence of adverse events potentially attributable to nursing care in medical units: cross sectional record review.
    D'Amour D; Dubois CA; Tchouaket E; Clarke S; Blais R
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 Jun; 51(6):882-91. PubMed ID: 24238893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured implicit review: a new method for monitoring nursing care quality.
    Pearson ML; Lee JL; Chang BL; Elliott M; Kahn KL; Rubenstein LV
    Med Care; 2000 Nov; 38(11):1074-91. PubMed ID: 11078049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QA: monitoring nursing standards of care with computer support.
    Shockey MH
    J Qual Assur; 1989; 11(4):16-8, 38. PubMed ID: 10295583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Licensed nurse staffing and adverse events in hospitals.
    Unruh L
    Med Care; 2003 Jan; 41(1):142-52. PubMed ID: 12544551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing nursing quality.
    Graham RG; DePorter JG
    Top Health Care Financ; 1991; 18(2):46-52. PubMed ID: 1767443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automating and improving the data quality of a nursing department quality management program at a university hospital.
    Welton JM; Jarr S
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1997 Dec; 23(12):623-35. PubMed ID: 9476199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing quality of nursing care.
    Redfern SJ; Norman IJ; Tomalin DA; Oliver S
    Qual Health Care; 1993 Jun; 2(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 10131632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Auditing the nursing care methodology].
    Faraco MM; de Albuquerque GL
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2004; 57(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 15603479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient safety incident reports related to traditional Japanese Kampo medicines: medication errors and adverse drug events in a university hospital for a ten-year period.
    Shimada Y; Fujimoto M; Nogami T; Watari H; Kitahara H; Misawa H; Kimbara Y
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2017 Dec; 17(1):547. PubMed ID: 29268743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery from medical errors: the critical care nursing safety net.
    Rothschild JM; Hurley AC; Landrigan CP; Cronin JW; Martell-Waldrop K; Foskett C; Burdick E; Czeisler CA; Bates DW
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2006 Feb; 32(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 16568919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of nursing service administration by systematic thinking. 2].
    Kango; 1985 May; 37(6):117-30. PubMed ID: 3854381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hand-held computers in clinical audit: a comparison with established paper and pencil methods.
    Curl M; Robinson D
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1994; 7(3):16-20. PubMed ID: 10136781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The economic burden of nurse-sensitive adverse events in 22 medical-surgical units: retrospective and matching analysis.
    Tchouaket E; Dubois CA; D'Amour D
    J Adv Nurs; 2017 Jul; 73(7):1696-1711. PubMed ID: 28103397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical tools for quality assurance: criteria development sheet and data retrieval form.
    Marker CG
    J Nurs Qual Assur; 1988 Feb; 2(2):43-54. PubMed ID: 3335593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.