These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12694696)

  • 1. Preparing for perception and action (I): the role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm.
    Adam JJ; Hommel B; Umiltà C
    Cogn Psychol; 2003 May; 46(3):302-58. PubMed ID: 12694696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor set modulates automatic priming effects of uninformative cues.
    Adam JJ; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 18280449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influences of presentation mode and time pressure on the utilisation of advance information in response preparation.
    Sangals J; Sommer W; Leuthold H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Jan; 109(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11766138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pupil dilation in response preparation.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 18067982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of age on performance in a finger-precuing task.
    Adam JJ; Paas FG; Teeken JC; van Loon EM; van Boxtel MP; Houx PJ; Jolles J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):870-83. PubMed ID: 9627422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm.
    Meiran N; Daichman A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1272-88. PubMed ID: 16532859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching.
    Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):488-92. PubMed ID: 12921429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of response grouping on free-choice decision making in a response selection task.
    Khan MA; Mourton S; Buckolz E; Adam JJ; Hayes AE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20188342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: the precuing of hand, digit, and duration.
    Zelaznik HN; Hahn R
    J Mot Behav; 1985 Jun; 17(2):190-218. PubMed ID: 15140691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing.
    Adam JJ; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subliminal Gestalt grouping: evidence of perceptual grouping by proximity and similarity in absence of conscious perception.
    Montoro PR; Luna D; Ortells JJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Apr; 25():1-8. PubMed ID: 24518805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial attention: different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues?
    Lu ZL; Dosher BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Oct; 26(5):1534-48. PubMed ID: 11039483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms.
    Sewell DK; Colagiuri B; Livesey EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1644-1665. PubMed ID: 28840573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dominance dynamics of competition between intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues.
    Luna D; Villalba-García C; Montoro PR; Hinojosa JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():146-54. PubMed ID: 27423888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mask-dependent attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection: the psychometric function for contrast.
    Smith PL; Wolfgang BJ; Sinclair AJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1056-75. PubMed ID: 15675651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does task-set reconfiguration create cognitive slack?
    Gilbert SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15709865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.
    Reeve TG; Proctor RW; Weeks DJ; Dornier L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 1437478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.