These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12695713)

  • 1. Performance of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of organic load.
    Codling CE; Maillard JY; Russell AD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 12695713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Manuj K; Gunderson C; Troupe J; Huber ME
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Jul; 32(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 16845270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions against ocular pathogens.
    Miller MJ; Callahan DE; McGrath D; Manchester R; Norton SE
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11215601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loss of bactericidal activity from contact lens storage solutions.
    Rosenthal RA; McDonald MM; Schlitzer RL; Abshire R; Stone R
    CLAO J; 1997 Jan; 23(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 9001774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of contact lens solutions.
    Kal A; Toker MI; Kaya S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 37(5):1103-1114. PubMed ID: 27738866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contact lens disinfecting solutions antibacterial efficacy: comparison between clinical isolates and the standard ISO ATCC strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
    Mohammadinia M; Rahmani S; Eslami G; Ghassemi-Broumand M; Aghazadh Amiri M; Aghaie G; Tabatabaee SM; Taheri S; Behgozin A
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Feb; 26(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 22094301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative disinfectant efficacy of two disinfecting solutions against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Key JE; Monnat K
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 8728618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacies of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Amiri MA; Mohammadinia M; Tabatabaee M; Askarizadeh F; Behgozin A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Jul; 94(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 21255080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new method for evaluation of compatibility of contact lenses and lens cases with contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Mowrey-McKee M; Borazjani R; Collins G; Cook J; Norton S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 22178791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Antimicrobial Activity of Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions in the Presence of Different Organic Soils.
    Yamasaki K; Mizuno Y; Kitamura Y; Willcox M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jul; 46(4):201-207. PubMed ID: 32097184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of six multipurpose soft contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Mori O; Kawaminami S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 16918772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Component Analysis of Multipurpose Contact Lens Solutions To Enhance Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
    Lin L; Kim J; Chen H; Kowalski R; Nizet V
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2016 Jul; 60(7):4259-63. PubMed ID: 27139484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Acanthamoeba protect Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the bactericidal effects of contact lens disinfecting systems?
    Willcox MD; Low R; Hon J; Harmis N
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26 Suppl 1():S32-5. PubMed ID: 9685017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates to antibiotics and contact lens multipurpose disinfecting solutions.
    Watanabe K; Zhu H; Willcox M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Dec; 55(12):8475-9. PubMed ID: 25468893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft contact lens disinfection solution efficacy: clinical Fusarium isolates vs. ATCC 36031.
    Hume EB; Flanagan J; Masoudi S; Zhu H; Cole N; Willcox MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 19384259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a warming device on contact lens case contamination.
    Willcox MD; Zhu H; Vijay AK
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Nov; 38(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 22868901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lens material and formulation of multipurpose solutions affects contact lens disinfection.
    Santos L; Oliveira R; Oliveira ME; Azeredo J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2011 Aug; 34(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 21367650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Susceptibility of various corneal fungal isolates and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Pinna A; Usai D; Zanetti S; Thomas PA; Kaliamurthy J
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2013 Mar; 7(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 23493005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of synthetic Cecropin (D5C) in disinfecting contact lens solutions.
    Sousa LB; Mannis MJ; Schwab IR; Cullor J; Hosotani H; Smith W; Jaynes J
    CLAO J; 1996 Apr; 22(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8728617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biocide uptake in contact lenses and loss of fungicidal activity during storage of contact lenses.
    Rosenthal RA; Dassanayake NL; Schlitzer RL; Schlech BA; Meadows DL; Stone RP
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):262-6. PubMed ID: 17099385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.