These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12695880)

  • 1. Subchondral bone and cartilage thickness from MRI: effects of chemical-shift artifact.
    McGibbon CA; Bencardino J; Palmer WE
    MAGMA; 2003 Feb; 16(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12695880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of subchondral bone and cartilage thickness measurement from MRI.
    McGibbon CA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Sep; 21(7):707-14. PubMed ID: 14559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of cartilage and subchondral bone spatial thickness distribution from MRI.
    McGibbon CA; Bencardino J; Yeh ED; Palmer WE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jun; 17(6):703-15. PubMed ID: 12766900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness.
    Murray RC; Branch MV; Tranquille C; Woods S
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 16334962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the chemical shift artifact on measurements of compact bone thickness in equine distal limb MR images.
    Dimock AN; Spriet M
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2010; 51(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 20806873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15068938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface extraction and thickness measurement of the articular cartilage from MR images using directional gradient vector flow snakes.
    Tang J; Millington S; Acton ST; Crandall J; Hurwitz S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):896-907. PubMed ID: 16686412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing and eliminating errors in enhancement and subtraction artifacts in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: Chemical shift artifact of the third kind.
    Derakhshan JJ; McDonald ES; Siegelman ES; Schnall MD; Wehrli FW
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):2277-2289. PubMed ID: 28840613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T.
    Siepmann DB; McGovern J; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18029893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques.
    Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reversed laminar appearance of articular cartilage by T1-weighting in 3D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) imaging.
    Xia Y; Zheng S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Sep; 32(3):733-7. PubMed ID: 20815075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiplanar reconstruction recovers morphological cartilage assessment reproducibility from maloriented coronal MRI scans.
    Inglis D; Wong AK; Eckstein F; Adachi JD; Beattie KA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Mar; 65(3):790-5. PubMed ID: 20939062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limits on the accuracy of 3-D thickness measurement in magnetic resonance images--effects of voxel anisotropy.
    Sato Y; Tanaka H; Nishii T; Nakanishi K; Sugano N; Kubota T; Nakamura H; Yoshikawa H; Ochi T; Tamura S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1076-88. PubMed ID: 12956263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction.
    Marshall KW; Mikulis DJ; Guthrie BM
    J Orthop Res; 1995 Nov; 13(6):814-23. PubMed ID: 8544016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging.
    El-Khoury GY; Alliman KJ; Lundberg HJ; Rudert MJ; Brown TD; Saltzman CL
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):768-73. PubMed ID: 15516604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.