1243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12695955)
1. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect.
Kim KC; Ha YC; Kang BJ; Lee YK; Ji HM; Koo KH
J Orthop Sci; 2012 Jan; 17(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22094605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.
Schmolders J; Friedrich MJ; Michel RD; Randau TM; Wimmer MD; Strauss AC; Kohlhof H; Wirtz DC; Gravius S
Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 25277762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency.
Chen WM; Engh CA; Hopper RH; McAuley JP; Engh CA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Feb; 82(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 10682728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices.
Kokubo Y; Oki H; Sugita D; Negoro K; Takeno K; Miyazaki T; Nakajima H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 May; 26(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 27010392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Acetabulum reinforcement ring with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision].
Liu W; Yang J; Pei F; Shen B; Zhou Z; Kang P
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(8):902-4. PubMed ID: 23012918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring--still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years.
Kösters C; Schliemann B; Decking D; Simon U; Zurstegge M; Decking J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 26280965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An evaluation of the methods used for removal of components and cement in revision hip arthroplasty].
Erdemli B
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 15347918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results.
Civinini R; Capone A; Carulli C; Villano M; Gusso MI
Int Orthop; 2008 Apr; 32(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 17221262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Acetabular revision surgery with the oblong revision cup : clinical and radiological results of 217 cases].
Fickert S; Pfeiffer S; Walter A; Günther KP; Witzleb WC
Orthopade; 2010 May; 39(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 19838666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.
Fink B; Schlumberger M; Oremek D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 475(8):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 28353049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].
Chen L; Hong G; Lin T; Huang L; Zhang Q; He W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 34(3):341-346. PubMed ID: 32174080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
