These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12696019)

  • 1. Cost-effective designs for linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex traits.
    Service SK; Sandkuijl LA; Freimer NB
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 May; 72(5):1213-20. PubMed ID: 12696019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haplotype block structure and its applications to association studies: power and study designs.
    Zhang K; Calabrese P; Nordborg M; Sun F
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Dec; 71(6):1386-94. PubMed ID: 12439824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection using genotype data and their applications to association studies.
    Zhang K; Qin ZS; Liu JS; Chen T; Waterman MS; Sun F
    Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):908-16. PubMed ID: 15078859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allele frequencies and the r2 measure of linkage disequilibrium: impact on design and interpretation of association studies.
    Wray NR
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2005 Apr; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 15901470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomewide linkage disequilibrium mapping of severe bipolar disorder in a population isolate.
    Ophoff RA; Escamilla MA; Service SK; Spesny M; Meshi DB; Poon W; Molina J; Fournier E; Gallegos A; Mathews C; Neylan T; Batki SL; Roche E; Ramirez M; Silva S; De Mille MC; Dong P; Leon PE; Reus VI; Sandkuijl LA; Freimer NB
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Sep; 71(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 12119601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association mapping in structured populations.
    Pritchard JK; Stephens M; Rosenberg NA; Donnelly P
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 10827107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome screens using linkage disequilibrium tests: optimal marker characteristics and feasibility.
    Chapman NH; Wijsman EM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Dec; 63(6):1872-85. PubMed ID: 9837839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical multilocus methods for disequilibrium analysis in complex traits.
    Ott J; Hoh J
    Hum Mutat; 2001 Apr; 17(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 11295826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits.
    Purcell S; Cherny SS; Sham PC
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(1):149-50. PubMed ID: 12499305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
    Abecasis GR; Cookson WO; Cardon LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 11349228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines.
    Ching A; Caldwell KS; Jung M; Dolan M; Smith OS; Tingey S; Morgante M; Rafalski AJ
    BMC Genet; 2002 Oct; 3():19. PubMed ID: 12366868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for genotyping in genomewide linkage studies: single-nucleotide-polymorphism maps versus microsatellite maps.
    Evans DM; Cardon LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 15311375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the power between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers for linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of an electrophysiological phenotype.
    Lin HF; Juo SH; Cheng R
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. PubMed ID: 16451683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting markers and evaluating coverage.
    Cleveland MA; Deeb N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 871():55-71. PubMed ID: 22565833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power and efficiency of the TDT and case-control design for association scans.
    McGinnis R; Shifman S; Darvasi A
    Behav Genet; 2002 Mar; 32(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12036111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium and its effect on non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis using two high density single-nucleotide polymorphism mapping panels.
    Murray SS
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S85. PubMed ID: 16451700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The power of association studies to detect the contribution of candidate genetic loci to variation in complex traits.
    Long AD; Langley CH
    Genome Res; 1999 Aug; 9(8):720-31. PubMed ID: 10447507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A coalescent approach to study linkage disequilibrium between single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Zöllner S; von Haeseler A
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):615-28. PubMed ID: 10677321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nested association mapping for identification of functional markers.
    Guo B; Sleper DA; Beavis WD
    Genetics; 2010 Sep; 186(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 20551444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.