193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12696288)
1. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy.
Belli P; Pastore G; Romani M; Terribile D; Canadè A; Costantini M
Rays; 2002; 27(4):241-57. PubMed ID: 12696288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy.
Preda L; Villa G; Rizzo S; Bazzi L; Origgi D; Cassano E; Bellomi M
Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(5):R53. PubMed ID: 16959028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for recurrences in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery: is there a role for MRI?
Gorechlad JW; McCabe EB; Higgins JH; Likosky DS; Lewis PJ; Rosenkranz KM; Barth RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):1703-9. PubMed ID: 18266039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recurrence rates after DCE-MRI image guided planning for breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer patients.
Garimella V; Qutob O; Fox JN; Long ED; Chaturvedi A; Turnbull LW; Drew PJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 33(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 17085007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution.
Pass H; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Decker D; Pettinga J; Ingold J; Benitez P; Neumann K; Rebner M; Dekhne N; Martinez A
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 15305400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indications for MR mammography. A Belgian study.
Van Goethem M; Biltjes IG; De Schepper AM
JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun; 83(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 11025925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer?
Stucky CC; McLaughlin SA; Dueck AC; Gray RJ; Giurescu ME; Carpenter SG; Grimsby GM; Apsey HA; Pockaj BA
Am J Surg; 2009 Oct; 198(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 19800466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of FDG PET and MRI for evaluating the tumor extent of breast cancer and the impact of FDG PET on the systemic staging and prognosis of patients who are candidates for breast-conserving therapy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18663562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R
Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Wasif N; Garreau J; Terando A; Kirsch D; Mund DF; Giuliano AE
Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 19886147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast-conserving therapy for invasive carcinoma: diagnosis of local recurrence.
Rutgers EJ; van Rossum AB; Peterse JL; Cohen P; Borger JH; Kemperman HW
Neth J Surg; 1991 Aug; 43(4):110-3. PubMed ID: 1944988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there a role for routine use of MRI in selection of patients for breast-conserving cancer therapy?
Grobmyer SR; Mortellaro VE; Marshall J; Higgs GM; Hochwald SN; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM; Cance WG
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 May; 206(5):1045-50; discussion 1050-2. PubMed ID: 18471753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A case of fat necrosis after breast quadrantectomy in which preoperative diagnosis was enabled by MRI with fat suppression technique.
Iwasaki H; Morimoto K; Koh M; Okamura T; Wakasa K; Wakasa T; Kinoshita H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 22(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 15010123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ultrasound and mammography follow-up of findings after breast saving operation and adjuvant irradiation].
Mundinger A; Martini C; Madjar H; Laubenberger J; Gufler H; Langer M
Ultraschall Med; 1996 Feb; 17(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8650523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.
Bilimoria KY; Cambic A; Hansen NM; Bethke KP
Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7. PubMed ID: 17515485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical oncologic perspective on breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Bloom S; Morrow M
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):277-94, ix. PubMed ID: 20494312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
