BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12696289)

  • 1. Diagnostic imaging of breast implants: role of MRI.
    Belli P; Romani M; Magistrelli A; Masetti R; Pastore G; Costantini M
    Rays; 2002; 27(4):259-77. PubMed ID: 12696289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diagnosis of breast diseases with magnetic resonance tomography].
    Kvistad KA; Gribbestad IS; Haraldseth O; Nilsen G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 May; 120(12):1451-8. PubMed ID: 10851944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of diagnostic imaging in women with breast implants.
    Barloon TJ; Young DC; Bergus G
    Am Fam Physician; 1996 Nov; 54(6):2029-36. PubMed ID: 8900362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the augmented breast.
    Reynolds HE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1131-45. PubMed ID: 7480661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
    Cleveland DL; Broussard M
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 8570848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation.
    Hölmich LR; Vejborg I; Conrad C; Sletting S; McLaughlin JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 15664285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnostic impact of contrast-enhanced MRI in management of breast disease.
    Upponi SS; Warren RM
    Breast; 2006 Dec; 15(6):736-43. PubMed ID: 16650993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Present indications for the use of breast MRI.
    Del Maschio A; De Gaspari A; Panizza P
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):55-8. PubMed ID: 12585655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy].
    Ling H; Gu YJ; Wang XH; Liu GY; Huang O; Wang LP; Shen KW; Shen ZZ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(15):1036-9. PubMed ID: 17074240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Questioning minimum screening mammography reading workload, and MRI assessment of breast microcalcifications.
    Ciatto S
    Breast; 2006 Aug; 15(4):461-3. PubMed ID: 16737815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Magnetic tomography in diagnosis of breast implant rupture].
    Kvistad KA; Smenes E; Thuomas KA; Gribbestad IS; Samdal F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Sep; 117(22):3226-8. PubMed ID: 9411862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: experience with 59 implants.
    Ahn CY; DeBruhl ND; Gorczyca DP; Shaw WW; Bassett LW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Oct; 94(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 7938284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation?
    Orel S
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 26(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 18258977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging of Trilucent TM breast implants.
    Elson EM; Jones A; King R; Chapman P; Stanek J; Irvine AT; Bingham JB
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 12014870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
    Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques.
    Everson LI; Parantainen H; Detlie T; Stillman AE; Olson PN; Landis G; Foshager MC; Cunningham B; Griffiths HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 8010248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
    Gökalp G; Topal U
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.