162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12696289)
21. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R
Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnostics of breast implants: a survey].
Hauth EA; Hoffmann O; Zadow-Eulerich T; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2008; 48(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 18431047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A review of current evidence-based clinical applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging.
DeMartini W; Lehman C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 18941394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imaging.
Kuhl CK
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug; 14(3):305-28, v. PubMed ID: 17098173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience.
Nakano S; Yoshida M; Fujii K; Yorozuya K; Mouri Y; Kousaka J; Fukutomi T; Kimura J; Ishiguchi T; Ohno K; Mizumoto T; Harao M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 39(9):552-9. PubMed ID: 19654132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Imaging appearance of parasitic infestations of the breast: a report of two cases and review of the literature.
Sinha A; Sharma R; Kandpal H; Seenu V; Sharma M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):506-9. PubMed ID: 18568534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients: correlation with surgical findings.
Scaranelo AM; Marques AF; Smialowski EB; Lederman HM
Sao Paulo Med J; 2004 Mar; 122(2):41-7. PubMed ID: 15257358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Imaging findings of breast augmentation with injected hydrophilic polyacrylamide gel: patient reports and literature review.
Khedher NB; David J; Trop I; Drouin S; Peloquin L; Lalonde L
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 19836915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of MRI findings after polyacrylamide gel injection for breast augmentation.
Lui CY; Ho CM; Iu PP; Cheung WY; Lam HS; Cheng MS; Liu HL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 18716094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of breast MRI in clinical practice.
Brennan M; Spillane A; Houssami N
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 38(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 19575070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Weigel S; Nüssle-Kügele K; Sittek H; Arand B; Morakkabati N; Leutner C; Tombach B; Nordhoff D; Perlet C; Rieber A; Heindel W; Brambs HJ; Schild H
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Kneeshaw PJ; Lowry M; Manton D; Hubbard A; Drew PJ; Turnbull LW
Breast; 2006 Feb; 15(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16002292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.
Bilimoria KY; Cambic A; Hansen NM; Bethke KP
Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7. PubMed ID: 17515485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The emerging role of breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Hollingsworth AB; Stough RG
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2003 Jul; 96(7):299-307. PubMed ID: 12955974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy for large breast cancers: a prospective phase II study.
Bollet MA; Thibault F; Bouillon K; Meunier M; Sigal-Zafrani B; Savignoni A; Diéras V; Nos C; Salmon R; Fourquet A;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17449193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture.
Hölmich LR; Friis S; Fryzek JP; Vejborg IM; Conrad C; Sletting S; Kjøller K; McLaughlin JK; Olsen JH
Arch Surg; 2003 Jul; 138(7):801-6. PubMed ID: 12860765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
Warner E
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Johnson MM
Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(3):261M-81M. PubMed ID: 22267704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
