These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12696808)

  • 1. Repetition blindness for words yet repetition advantage for nonwords.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 12696808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reverse "repetition blindness" and release from "repetition blindness": constructive variations on the "repetition blindness" effect.
    Whittlesea BW; Wai KH
    Psychol Res; 1997; 60(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 9342961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Now you see it, now you don't: repetition blindness for nonwords.
    Morris AL; Still ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):146-66. PubMed ID: 18194060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repetition blindness: out of sight or out of mind?
    Morris AL; Harris CL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 15462629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repetition blindness: the effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement.
    Kanwisher N; Potter MC
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 2927309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity effects in word and pseudoword repetition priming.
    Rueckl JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):374-91. PubMed ID: 2140399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens.
    Kanwisher N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):404-21. PubMed ID: 1830084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure.
    Hochhaus L; Marohn KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):422-32. PubMed ID: 1830085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repetition blindness between visually different items: the case of pictures and words.
    Bavelier D
    Cognition; 1994 Mar; 51(3):199-236. PubMed ID: 8194301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of stimulus repetition on cortical magnetic responses evoked by words and nonwords.
    Sekiguchi T; Koyama S; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):118-28. PubMed ID: 11525321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: token individuation for translation equivalents.
    Altarriba J; Soltano EG
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):700-11. PubMed ID: 8961815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces.
    Bentin S; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Jun; 117(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 2969032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.
    McCann RS; Folk CL; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1015-29. PubMed ID: 1431741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calling all codes: interactive effects of semantics, phonology, and orthography produce dissociations in a repetition blindness paradigm.
    Stolz JA; Neely JH
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(1):105-28. PubMed ID: 18437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.
    Hildebrandt N; Caplan D; Sokol S; Torreano L
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 7885263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of letter repetition in words and nonwords: the effect of opposite-case distractors.
    Krueger LE; Stadtlander LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 1837305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of novel word learning.
    Szmalec A; Duyck W; Vandierendonck A; Mata AB; Page MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18785073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.