These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12697983)

  • 61. Voice Quality in Native and Foreign Languages Investigated by Inverse Filtering and Perceptual Analyses.
    Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):261.e25-261.e31. PubMed ID: 27495969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Perceptual, auditory and acoustic vocal analysis of speech and singing in choir conductors.
    Rehder MI; Behlau M
    Pro Fono; 2008; 20(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 18852968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders.
    Aghajanzadeh M; Darouie A; Dabirmoghaddam P; Salehi A; Rahgozar M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):250.e9-250.e15. PubMed ID: 27542776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of Habitual and High Pitch Phonation in Teachers With and Without Vocal Fatigue.
    Thomas SA; Maruthy S
    J Voice; 2022 Jan; 36(1):141.e1-141.e9. PubMed ID: 32417040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A voice acoustic analysis of thyroid adenoma patients after a unilateral thyroid lobectomy.
    Li C; Tao Z; Qu J; Zhou T; Xia F
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):e23-6. PubMed ID: 21530164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Teflon injection in 16 patients with paralytic dysphonia: perceptual and acoustic evaluations.
    Hammarberg B; Fritzell B; Schiratzki H
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Feb; 49(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 6700205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients.
    Pribuisiene R; Uloza V; Kupcinskas L; Jonaitis L
    J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 15925484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Immediate Effect of Stimulability Assessment on Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Patient-Perceptual Measures of Voice.
    Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e9-507.e14. PubMed ID: 26233832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Perception of synthesized voice quality in connected speech by Cantonese speakers.
    Yiu EM; Murdoch B; Hird K; Lau P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1091-101. PubMed ID: 12243157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Self-perception, complaints and vocal quality among undergraduate students enrolled in a Pedagogy course.
    Fabron EM; Regaçone SF; Marino VC; Mastria ML; Motonaga SM; Sebastião LT
    Codas; 2015; 27(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 26222947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [THE APPLICATION OF SHORT-TERM EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS IN DIAGNOSING OCCUPATIONAL VOICE DISORDERS].
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Just M; Tyc M; Wiktorowicz J; Morawska J; Śliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2015; 66(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 26294314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparison of subjective assessment of voice disorders and objective voice measurement.
    Hanschmann H; Lohmann A; Berger R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 20938187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Diplophonia reappraised.
    Cavalli L; Hirson A
    J Voice; 1999 Dec; 13(4):542-56. PubMed ID: 10622520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Objective and subjective evaluation of voice quality in multiple sclerosis.
    Dogan M; Midi I; Yazici MA; Kocak I; Günal D; Sehitoglu MA
    J Voice; 2007 Nov; 21(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16815671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effect of pregnancy on the speaking voice.
    Hamdan AL; Mahfoud L; Sibai A; Seoud M
    J Voice; 2009 Jul; 23(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 18346868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Acoustic analysis of voice in normal and high pitch phonation: a comparative study.
    Aithal VU; Bellur R; John S; Varghese C; Guddattu V
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22076072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech.
    Hillenbrand J; Houde RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 8729919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. An evaluation of residue features as correlates of voice disorders.
    Prosek RA; Montgomery AA; Walden BE; Hawkins DB
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Apr; 20(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 3584528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Associations between voice ergonomic risk factors and acoustic features of the voice.
    Rantala LM; Hakala S; Holmqvist S; Sala E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Oct; 40(3):99-105. PubMed ID: 24007529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.