These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12698118)

  • 1. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the trunk movement more perturbed after an asymmetric than after a symmetric perturbation during lifting?
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Jul; 37(7):1071-7. PubMed ID: 15165877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trunk muscle activation and low back loading in lifting in the absence of load knowledge.
    de Looze MP; Boeken-Kruger MC; Steenhuizen S; Baten CT; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):333-44. PubMed ID: 10755657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Back muscle response to sudden trunk loading can be modified by training among healthcare workers.
    Pedersen MT; Essendrop M; Skotte JH; Jørgensen K; Schibye B; Fallentin N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):1454-60. PubMed ID: 17545916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a stiff lifting belt on spine compression during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Suwarganda EK; Bruijnen TB; Peters RJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):E833-9. PubMed ID: 17047531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
    Mirka GA; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of trunk muscle fatigue and load timing on spinal responses during sudden hand loading.
    Grondin DE; Potvin JR
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):e237-45. PubMed ID: 18617419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of prior exposure, warning, and initial standing posture on muscular and kinematic responses to sudden loading of a hand-held box.
    Mawston GA; McNair PJ; Boocock MG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Mar; 22(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 17156903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional changes in spine posture at lift onset with changes in lift distance and lift style.
    Gill KP; Bennett SJ; Savelsbergh GJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1599-604. PubMed ID: 17621206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lifting over an obstacle: effects of one-handed lifting and hand support on trunk kinematics and low back loading.
    Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Feb; 37(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 14706328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 26475223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.