These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12698119)

  • 1. Effects of endplate removal on the structural properties of the lower lumbar vertebral bodies.
    Oxland TR; Grant JP; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):771-7. PubMed ID: 12698119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of bone density and disc degeneration on the structural property distributions in the lower lumbar vertebral endplates.
    Grant JP; Oxland TR; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Sep; 20(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 12382980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study on the structural properties of the lumbar endplate: histological structure, the effect of bone density, and spinal level.
    Hou Y; Luo Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):E427-33. PubMed ID: 19454994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influences of disc degeneration and bone mineral density on the structural properties of lumbar end plates.
    Hou Y; Yuan W
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 22366078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effect of disc degeneration on the structural property distributions in the cervical vertebral endplates].
    Li JY; Zhao WD; Zhu QA; Yuan L; Li M; Lin LJ; Zhang MC
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 42(21):1330-2. PubMed ID: 15634437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates.
    Grant JP; Oxland TR; Dvorak MF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):889-96. PubMed ID: 11317111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of design and positioning of carbon fiber lumbar interbody cages and their subsidence in vertebral bodies.
    Lam FC; Alkalay R; Groff MW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Apr; 25(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 21430566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of the biomechanical property of the endplate in anterior cervical fusion.
    Li JY; Zhu QA; Yuan L; Zhao WD; Lin LJ; Zhang MC; Huang WH
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 May; 23(5):402-8. PubMed ID: 12754113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loss of cervical endplate integrity following minimal surface preparation.
    Cheng CC; Ordway NR; Zhang X; Lu YM; Fang H; Fayyazi AH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1852-5. PubMed ID: 17762292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support.
    Lowe TG; Hashim S; Wilson LA; O'Brien MF; Smith DA; Diekmann MJ; Trommeter J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2389-94. PubMed ID: 15507800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failure of human cervical endplates: a cadaveric experimental model.
    Truumees E; Demetropoulos CK; Yang KH; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(19):2204-8. PubMed ID: 14520032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study.
    Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Charlebois M; Heini P; Schneider E; Zysset P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1722-30. PubMed ID: 18628704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.
    Lim TH; Kwon H; Jeon CH; Kim JG; Sokolowski M; Natarajan R; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):951-6. PubMed ID: 11317120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of ProDisc-C failure strength with cervical bone mineral content and endplate strength.
    Zhang X; Ordway NR; Tan R; Rim BC; Fayyazi AH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):400-5. PubMed ID: 18679093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body.
    Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17268265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of vertebral strength topography with 3-dimensional computed tomographic structure.
    Noshchenko A; Plaseied A; Patel VV; Burger E; Baldini T; Yun L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 22869060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
    Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new distractable implant for vertebral body replacement: biomechanical testing of four implants for the thoracolumbar spine.
    Reinhold M; Schmoelz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1375-82. PubMed ID: 19190924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
    Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.