These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12699144)

  • 1. Disrupting attention: the need for retrieval cues in working memory theories.
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 12699144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theoretical implications of extralist probes for directed forgetting.
    Sahakyan L; Goodmon LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 20565210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; Gee NR; Janczura GA
    Psychol Rev; 1998 Apr; 105(2):299-324. PubMed ID: 9577240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
    Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval-induced forgetting and part-list cuing in associatively structured lists.
    Bäuml KH; Kuhbandner C
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Dec; 31(8):1188-97. PubMed ID: 15058680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological correlates of competitor activation predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Hellerstedt R; Johansson M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1619-29. PubMed ID: 23365212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Part-set cuing of order information: implications for associative theories of serial order memory.
    Serra M; Nairne JS
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jul; 28(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 10983459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective memory retrieval can impair and improve retrieval of other memories.
    Bäuml KH; Samenieh A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):488-94. PubMed ID: 21942495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval-induced forgetting in implicit memory tests: the role of test awareness.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):490-4. PubMed ID: 16235634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect.
    Bäuml KH; Dobler IM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 24707790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ability of familiarity, disruption, and the relative strength of nonenvironmental context cues to explain unreliable environmental-context-dependent memory effects in free recall.
    Rutherford A
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1419-28. PubMed ID: 11219969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory retrieval given two independent cues: cue selection or parallel access?
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):243-94. PubMed ID: 15020213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. True (but not false) memories are subject to retrieval-induced forgetting in children.
    Price HL; Phenix TL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 May; 133():1-15. PubMed ID: 25725455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.
    McDaniel MA; Guynn MJ; Einstein GO; Breneiser J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):605-14. PubMed ID: 15099129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue-independent forgetting by intentional suppression - Evidence for inhibition as the mechanism of intentional forgetting.
    Wang Y; Cao Z; Zhu Z; Cai H; Wu Y
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():31-5. PubMed ID: 26113446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failures of memory and the fate of forgotten memories.
    Miller RR
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2021 May; 181():107426. PubMed ID: 33794376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.