These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12699150)

  • 1. Data selection and natural sampling: probabilities do matter.
    Oaksford M; Wakefield M
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 12699150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantitative model of optimal data selection in Wason's selection task.
    Hattori M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Oct; 55(4):1241-72. PubMed ID: 12420994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task.
    Handley SJ; Feeney A; Harper C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):799-818. PubMed ID: 12188514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deciding between accounts of the selection task: a reply to Oaksford (2002).
    Feeney A; Handley S; Kentridge RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1079-88. PubMed ID: 12881170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logical reasoning and probabilities: a comprehensive test of Oaksford And Chater (2001).
    Oberauer K; Weidenfeld A; Hörnig R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 15376805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilities and utilities of fictional outcomes in Wason's four-card selection task.
    Kirby KN
    Cognition; 1994 Jan; 51(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 8149715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negations and natural sampling in data selection: ecological versus heuristic explanations of matching bias.
    Oaksford M; Moussakowski M
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):570-81. PubMed ID: 15478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal data selection: revision, review, and reevaluation.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):289-318. PubMed ID: 12921410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critique of Oaksford, Chater, and Larkin's (2000) conditional probability model of conditional reasoning.
    Schroyens W; Schaeken W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):140-9; discussion 150-6. PubMed ID: 12549590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian inference for the information gain model.
    Stringer S; Borsboom D; Wagenmakers EJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 21302022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The suppression of q card selections: evidence for deductive inference in Wason's selection task.
    Feeney A; Handley SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):1224-42. PubMed ID: 11131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generation of hypotheses in Wason's 2-4-6 task: an information theory approach.
    Cherubini P; Castelvecchio E; Cherubini AM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):309-32. PubMed ID: 15903119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The abstract selection task: new data and an almost comprehensive model.
    Klauer KC; Stahl C; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):680-703. PubMed ID: 17576147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Looking behind: Turning cards in the selection task.
    Nickerson RS; Butler SF; Barch DH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Aug; 74(8):1451-1464. PubMed ID: 33629644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transactional problem content in cost discounting: parallel effects for probability and delay.
    Jones S; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):739-47. PubMed ID: 21261420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
    Lassiter D; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():123-34. PubMed ID: 25497521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An item response theory analysis of the four-card selection task].
    Nakamura K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2009 Dec; 80(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 20095447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fragile nature of contextual preference reversals: Reply to Tsetsos, Chater, and Usher (2015).
    Trueblood JS; Brown SD; Heathcote A
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Oct; 122(4):848-53. PubMed ID: 26437154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choice strategies in multiple-cue probability learning.
    White CM; Koehler DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):757-68. PubMed ID: 17576152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.