BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12699195)

  • 1. A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):787-803. PubMed ID: 12699195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
    Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
    Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image denoising based on multiscale singularity detection for cone beam CT breast imaging.
    Zhong J; Ning R; Conover D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jun; 23(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 15191144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images.
    McLoughlin KJ; Bones PJ; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 15027524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
    Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature and contrast enhancement of mammographic image based on multiscale analysis and morphology.
    Wu S; Yu S; Yang Y; Xie Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():716948. PubMed ID: 24416072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Material decomposition for simulated dual-energy breast computed tomography via hybrid optimization method.
    Komolafe TE; Du Q; Zhang Y; Wu Z; Zhang C; Li M; Zheng J; Yang X
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1037-1054. PubMed ID: 33044222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of wavelet analysis for contrast enhancement in mammography.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Cavouras D; Bezerianos A; Panayiotakis G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():502-6. PubMed ID: 10179716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise reduction for magnetic resonance images via adaptive multiscale products thresholding.
    Bao P; Zhang L
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1089-99. PubMed ID: 12956264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical image restoration with different types of noise.
    Sánchez MG; Vidal V; Verdú G; Mayo P; Rodenas F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4382-5. PubMed ID: 23366898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital mammography: hybrid four-channel wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation.
    Qian W; Clarke LP; Song D; Clark RA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 May; 5(5):354-64. PubMed ID: 9597103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A new CBCT denoising method based on coefficient classification].
    Sun Q; Yin Y; Lu J; Peng Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 27(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 20649039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Wavelet threshold denoising algorithm for CR images].
    Li YH; Zhou HQ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 30(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 16646417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Homomorphic wavelet thresholding technique for denoising medical ultrasound images.
    Gupta S; Chauhan RC; Saxena SC
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(5):208-14. PubMed ID: 16126580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.