6187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12699550)
1. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.
Houten JK; Cooper PR
Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laminectomy and postero-lateral mass plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Punjaisee S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Jul; 87(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 15521231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation for cervical myelopathy in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Yang SC; Yu SW; Tu YK; Niu CC; Chen LH; Chen WJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):492-8. PubMed ID: 17912125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.
Chiba K; Ogawa Y; Ishii K; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Maruiwa H; Matsumoto M; Toyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 17172996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical results and complications of circumferential spinal cord decompression through a single posterior approach for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament.
Takahata M; Ito M; Abumi K; Kotani Y; Sudo H; Minami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(11):1199-208. PubMed ID: 18469693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.
Suk KS; Kim KT; Lee JH; Lee SH; Lim YJ; Kim JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):E656-60. PubMed ID: 17978640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enlarged laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy associated with kyphosis.
Du W; Zhang P; Shen Y; Zhang YZ; Ding WY; Ren LX
Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 23972376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.
Shiraishi T; Fukuda K; Yato Y; Nakamura M; Ikegami T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term results of tension-band laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: a ten-year follow-up.
Motosuneya T; Maruyama T; Yamada H; Tsuzuki N; Sakai H
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21196546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Updates on ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Surgical outcome of anterior decompression and fusion for the ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine : a comparison with laminoplasty].
Iwasaki M; Sakaura H; Fujimori T; Yoshikawa H; Okuda S
Clin Calcium; 2009 Oct; 19(10):1486-92. PubMed ID: 19794258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circumspinal decompression with dekyphosis stabilization for thoracic myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Kawahara N; Tomita K; Murakami H; Hato T; Demura S; Sekino Y; Nasu W; Fujimaki Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18165747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical laminoplasty.
Steinmetz MP; Resnick DK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6 Suppl):274S-281S. PubMed ID: 17097547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
Highsmith JM; Dhall SS; Haid RW; Rodts GE; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Avadhani A; Rajasekaran S; Shetty AP
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20494809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.
Yagi M; Ninomiya K; Kihara M; Horiuchi Y
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jan; 12(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 20043766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Miura J; Doita M; Miyata K; Marui T; Nishida K; Fujii M; Kurosaka M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19190428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Alafifi T; Kern R; Fehlings M
J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.
Seichi A; Takeshita K; Ohishi I; Kawaguchi H; Akune T; Anamizu Y; Kitagawa T; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 11242374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective review of cervical corpectomy: indications, complications and outcome.
Ozgen S; Naderi S; Ozek MM; Pamir MN
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2004 Oct; 146(10):1099-105; discussion 1105. PubMed ID: 15309581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
