281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12700550)
21. Response to the letter of Sheldon Wolff (Radiat. Res. 141, 230-231, 1995).
Ron E; Preston DL; Mabuchi K
Radiat Res; 1995 Jul; 143(1):116-7. PubMed ID: 7639847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Panel review: a review of past risk assessments and extrapolation problems with radiation.
Eisenbud M; Burns F; Jones WB; Cohen B
J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1980 Mar; 3(4 Spec No):419-30. PubMed ID: 7391735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Responsibility beyond 60 years.
Bennett BG
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5741):1649. PubMed ID: 16150979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Corrections to the paper "Fitting the Armitage-Doll model to radiation-exposed cohorts and implications for population cancer risks.
Little MP; Hawkins MM; Charles MW; Hildreth NG
Radiat Res; 1994 Jan; 137(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 8265782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Male breast cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors.
Ron E; Ikeda T; Preston DL; Tokuoka S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Apr; 97(8):603-5. PubMed ID: 15840883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Henry S. Kaplan Distinguished Scientist Award 2003. The crooked shall be made straight; dose-response relationships for carcinogenesis.
Hall EJ
Int J Radiat Biol; 2004 May; 80(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 15223765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Promoting action of radiation in the atomic bomb survivor cancer incidence data.
Jacob P
Radiat Res; 2008 May; 169(5):602; author reply 602-4. PubMed ID: 18439046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Supra-linear dose-response in the A-bomb study.
Gofman JW
Health Phys; 1989 Dec; 57(6):1037-8. PubMed ID: 2584021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [A survey of medical exposure dose delivered to examinees during X-ray diagnoses in Beijing].
Jia DL
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1988 Apr; 10(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 2970328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Understanding estimation of time and age effect-modification of radiation-induced cancer risks among atomic-bomb survivors.
Lagarde F
Health Phys; 2006 Dec; 91(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17099404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The radiation risk between facts and assumptions].
Frik W
Rofo; 1994 Mar; 160(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 8136469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Final discussions, summary and recommendations.
Feinendegen LE; Brooks AL; Morgan WF
Health Phys; 2011 Mar; 100(3):342-3. PubMed ID: 21285733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
Hunter N; Muirhead CR
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reducing radiation to children: the resident's role.
Prasad RS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):140-1. PubMed ID: 17411543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.
Little MP
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A43-59. PubMed ID: 19454804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation exposure and relative risk of breast cancer: an error perpetuated.
Cox CW
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):369-70. PubMed ID: 22190663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical radiation: too much of a good thing?
Harv Mens Health Watch; 2011 Dec; 16(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 22299200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Radiation can both cause and cure cancer].
Akerblom G
Vardfacket; 1978 Jan; 2(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 246339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Radiation protection of the patient in nuclear medicine].
Frischauf H
Acta Med Austriaca; 1978; 5(4-5):153-5. PubMed ID: 756129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Bashore TM
Am Heart J; 2004 Mar; 147(3):375-8. PubMed ID: 14999179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
