328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12701713)
1. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery.
Ratkay-Traub I; Ferincz IE; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM; Krueger RR
J Refract Surg; 2003; 19(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 12701713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flap characteristics, predictability, and safety of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser with the disposable suction ring for LASIK.
Pietilä J; Huhtala A; Mäkinen P; Uusitalo H
Eye (Lond); 2014 Jan; 28(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 24232315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical effects of femtosecond and microkeratome-based flap creation: prospective contralateral examination of two patients.
Krueger RR; Dupps WJ
J Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 23(8):800-7. PubMed ID: 17985800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap creation with the three-dimensional, transportable Ziemer FEMTO LDV model Z6 I femtosecond laser.
Pietilä J; Huhtala A; Mäkinen P; Salmenhaara K; Uusitalo H
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):650-5. PubMed ID: 24373615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancements with the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser following previous LASIK treatments.
Pietilä J; Huhtala A; Mäkinen P; Uusitalo H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):597-602. PubMed ID: 22814527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.
Zhou J; Gu W; Li S; Wu L; Gao Y; Guo X
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single versus double femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flap in contralateral eyes: visual and optical outcomes.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Javaloy J; García-Lázaro S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 22153090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracorneal ring segment implantation in corneas with post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia.
Piñero DP; Alio JL; Uceda-Montanes A; El Kady B; Pascual I
Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1665-74. PubMed ID: 19643485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrastromal corneal ring segments in a patient with previous laser in situ keratomileusis.
Fleming JF; Lovisolo CF
J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(3):365-7. PubMed ID: 10832987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.
Kahuam-López N; Navas A; Castillo-Salgado C; Graue-Hernandez EO; Jimenez-Corona A; Ibarra A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012946. PubMed ID: 32255519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):740-8. PubMed ID: 25840298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Cerviño-Expósito A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1934-44. PubMed ID: 21029903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LASIK for myopia using the Zeiss VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser.
Blum M; Kunert K; Gille A; Sekundo W
J Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 25(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 19431925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined ICRS insertion and LASIK to maximize postoperative residual bed thickness in high myopia.
Mian SI; Jarade EF; Scally A; Azar DT
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2383-90. PubMed ID: 15519093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy, safety, and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vryghem JC; Devogelaere T; Stodulka P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 20202543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK flap creation].
Hasimoto AR; Gomes MF; de Siqueira MA; Moreira H
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(6):335-8. PubMed ID: 24510077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
