328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12701713)
21. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study.
Durrie DS; Kezirian GM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 15721704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of corneal sensation between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
Li M; Zhou Z; Shen Y; Knorz MC; Gong L; Zhou X
J Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 30(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24763474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
Patel S; Alió JL; Artola A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parameters.
Mastropasqua L; Calienno R; Lanzini M; Salgari N; De Vecchi S; Mastropasqua R; Nubile M
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 37(3):635-641. PubMed ID: 27518898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome flap creation.
Antonios R; Arba Mosquera S; Awwad ST
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1602-9. PubMed ID: 26432116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Early flap displacement after LASIK.
Clare G; Moore TC; Grills C; Leccisotti A; Moore JE; Schallhorn S
Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1760-5. PubMed ID: 21550119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.
Muallem MS; Yoo SH; Romano AC; Marangon FB; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2295-302. PubMed ID: 15519078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of hyperopia from +1.25 to +5.00 diopters with the Technolas Keracor 117C laser.
Rashad KM
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11310760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optical Zone Centration Accuracy Using Corneal Fixation-based SMILE Compared to Eye Tracker-based Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
Reinstein DZ; Gobbe M; Gobbe L; Archer TJ; Carp GI
J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 26352563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.
Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Two-year outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segments for the correction of myopia.
Schanzlin DJ; Abbott RL; Asbell PA; Assil KK; Burris TE; Durrie DS; Fouraker BD; Lindstrom RL; McDonald JE; Verity SM; Waring GO
Ophthalmology; 2001 Sep; 108(9):1688-94. PubMed ID: 11535474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Femtosecond laser-assisted retreatment for residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vaddavalli PK; Yoo SH; Diakonis VF; Canto AP; Shah NV; Haddock LJ; Feuer WJ; Culbertson WW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1241-7. PubMed ID: 23711874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intraocular lens implantation and laser in situ keratomileusis (bioptics) to correct high myopia and hyperopia with astigmatism.
Velarde JI; Anton PG; de Valentin-Gamazo L
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2 Suppl):S234-7. PubMed ID: 11316030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Safety and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic correction performed under thin flaps.
Esquenazi S; Bui V; Grunstein L; Esquenazi I
Can J Ophthalmol; 2007 Aug; 42(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 17641703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laser in situ keratomileusis and intrastromal corneal ring segments for high myopia. Three-step procedure.
Primack JD; Azar DT
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 May; 29(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 12781268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of a multifunctional femtosecond laser for the creation of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Slade S; Ignacio T; Spector S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Mar; 44(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 29703284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Same-day intrastromal corneal ring segment and collagen cross-linking for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis: long-term results.
Yildirim A; Uslu H; Kara N; Cakir H; Gurler B; Colak HN; Ozgurhan EB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):1070-6. PubMed ID: 24513095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: Mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser.
Salomão MQ; Ambrósio R; Wilson SE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1756-60. PubMed ID: 19781472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laser in situ keratomileusis vs. laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASIK vs. LASEK).
Scerrati E
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2 Suppl):S219-21. PubMed ID: 11316025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
