These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12701888)
1. A comparison of newborn stylized and tomographic models for dose assessment in paediatric radiology. Staton RJ; Pazik FD; Nipper JC; Williams JL; Bolch WE Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(7):805-20. PubMed ID: 12701888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the VIP-Man model to calculate energy imparted and effective dose for x-ray examinations. Winslow M; Huda W; Xu XG; Chao TC; Shi CY; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 14744051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients. Lee C; Williams JL; Lee C; Bolch WE Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3537-48. PubMed ID: 16475752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination. Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Organ and effective doses in newborns and infants undergoing voiding cystourethrograms (VCUG): a comparison of stylized and tomographic phantoms. Pazik FD; Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):294-306. PubMed ID: 17278515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations. Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age-dependent organ and effective dose coefficients for external photons: a comparison of stylized and voxel-based paediatric phantoms. Lee C; Lee C; Bolch WE Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(18):4663-88. PubMed ID: 16953049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Creation of two tomographic voxel models of paediatric patients in the first year of life. Nipper JC; Williams JL; Bolch WE Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3143-64. PubMed ID: 12361215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study. Makri T; Yakoumakis E; Papadopoulou D; Gialousis G; Theodoropoulos V; Sandilos P; Georgiou E Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):5023-33. PubMed ID: 16985285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of PCXMC for patients with different body size in chest and abdominal x ray examinations: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Borrego D; Lowe EM; Kitahara CM; Lee C Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(6):065015. PubMed ID: 29465419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the need to revise the arm structure in stylized anthropomorphic phantoms in lateral photon irradiation geometry. Lee C; Lee C; Lee JK Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):N393-402. PubMed ID: 17047258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination. Lee C; Lee C; Staton RJ; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1858-73. PubMed ID: 17555267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effective dose evaluation for chest and abdomen X-ray tests. Lee SC; Wang JN; Liu SC; Jiang SH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):613-9. PubMed ID: 16604711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of photon organ and effective dose coefficients for PIMAL stylized phantom in bent positions in standard irradiation geometries. Dewji S; Reed KL; Hiller M Radiat Environ Biophys; 2017 Aug; 56(3):277-291. PubMed ID: 28643118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models. Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of z overscanning on normalized effective doses calculated for pediatric patients undergoing multidetector CT examinations. Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Karantanas A; Karabekios S; Gourtsoyiannis N Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 17500447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of US anthropometric reference data (1971-2000) with comparisons to both stylized and tomographic anatomic models. Huh C; Bolch WE Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(20):3411-29. PubMed ID: 14620066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons of point and average organ dose within an anthropomorphic physical phantom and a computational model of the newborn patient. Sessions JB; Roshau JN; Tressler MA; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bouchet LG; Bolch WE Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1080-9. PubMed ID: 12094977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in Kuwait. Brindhaban A; Al-Khalifah K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15266086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body. Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Mosseri M; Avraham B; Leitner Y; Shabat S Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 26704861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]