These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12703686)

  • 21. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of central corneal thickness in patients participating in a glaucoma screening programme and those who were examined in the glaucoma unit].
    Hufnagl C; Hitzl W; Hornykewycz K; Grabner G; Reitsamer HA
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Feb; 225(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 18293267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
    Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in Puerto Rican glaucoma patients.
    Villegas VM; Díaz L; Emanuelli A; Izquierdo NJ; Townsend W
    P R Health Sci J; 2007 Mar; 26(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 17674870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Midperipheral corneal thickness affects noncontact tonometry.
    Hamilton K
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 19223787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of an artificially-elevated intraocular pressure on corneal thickness in Chinese eye.
    Lam AK; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Sep; 17(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 9390368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-tonometry with the Ocuton S: evaluation of accuracy in glaucoma patients.
    Sacu S; Vass C; Schemper M; Rainer G
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Aug; 82(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 15291933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Incorporating corneal pachymetry into the management of glaucoma.
    Iester M; Mete M; Figus M; Frezzotti P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 19683164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intraocular pressure in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population.
    Fukuoka S; Aihara M; Iwase A; Araie M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 18039350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure.
    Hamilton KE; Pye DC; Aggarwala S; Evian S; Khosla J; Perera R
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17224746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Corneal thickness and visual field damage in glaucoma patients.
    Papadia M; Sofianos C; Iester M; Bricola G; Mete M; Traverso CE
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Jul; 21(7):943-7. PubMed ID: 16645628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements.
    Hamilton KE; Pye DC; Hali A; Lin C; Kam P; Ngyuen T
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 17224766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties in patients with myotonic dystrophy.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; Borrelli M; Palladino A; Di Gregorio MG; Politano L
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 19019447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Corneal thickness in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population.
    Suzuki S; Suzuki Y; Iwase A; Araie M
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1327-36. PubMed ID: 15964631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Corneal swelling and recovery following wear of thick hydrogel contact lenses in insulin-dependent diabetics.
    Skaff A; Cullen AP; Doughty MJ; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jul; 15(4):287-97. PubMed ID: 7667021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry].
    Domke N; Hager A; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Jul; 103(7):583-7. PubMed ID: 16786183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.